By this time in 2008, Hillary Clinton had conceded and suspended her campaign for the presidential nomination. Bernie Sanders hasn't yet done the same. Credit: United States Congress via Wikimedia Commons
By this time in 2008, Hillary Clinton had conceded and suspended her campaign for the presidential nomination. Bernie Sanders hasnt yet done the same.
By this time in 2008, Hillary Clinton had conceded and suspended her campaign for the presidential nomination. Bernie Sanders hasn’t yet done the same. United States Congress via Wikimedia Commons

Last night, when Hillary Clinton became the first woman to be the Democratic party’s presumptive nominee for president, something odd happened, and it wasn’t that I basically wept through her victory speech and watched this video multiple times, because my stance on this isn’t exactly a mystery and also I’ve been waiting for this moment since I was five. It was that on social media, Clinton supportersโ€”as well as Sanders supporters happy to see a woman get the nominationโ€”who’d kept quiet, perhaps out of fear of harassment, suddenly voiced their excitement at what’s objectively a historic win for gender equality, regardless of who you were rooting for.

But there was one moment in Clinton’s speech that stuck out to meโ€”when she said she thanked Sanders for running a strong campaign that heightened her own, and said, “Now I know it never feels good to put your heart into a cause or a candidate you believe in and to come up shortโ€”I know that feeling well.”

That little smiling chuckle says a lot, because Clinton does know that feeling well.

In 2008, she ran a campaign that was, well, a lot like Sanders’ in that it didn’t reach out to a broad coalition of voters until it was too late. Where Clinton and Sanders differ is that this time in 2008, Clinton conceded to Obama, and she did it in a race that was much closer than the one she finds herself in with Sanders.

I remember when Clinton conceded, because I was a Clinton supporter, and, as I’m sure many Sanders supporters are now, I was heartbroken. I also never questioned whether I would vote for Barack Obama and work on his campaign, and I did both of those things. Proudly. Because some things are more important than a single candidate, no matter how strongly you may believe in or identify with that person.

Clinton’s concession to Obama was graceful, but it was also absolutely necessary after the occasionally damaging campaign she’d run against him. Obama’s victory as the first African American presidential nominee was historicโ€”any response but graceful concession and recognition of the historic moment would’ve been inappropriate. Clinton went on to campaign for Obama, to serve as his secretary of state, and, now, to be waiting in the wings to receive his endorsement as the possible next president of the United States.

This is what Bernie Sanders should be doing. Not because he didn’t run a powerful campaign. But because the jig is up. The votes are in. The history has been made. That Sanders didn’t even bother to acknowledge the historic nature of Clinton’s win in his speech last night speaks volumes about a campaign that took pains to disparage the organizations that are doing the most valuable work on behalf of women in politics and expanding access to reproductive rights, and whose supporters are now shamelessly harassing female reporters in the wake of Clinton’s victory. This, when the real enemy isโ€”and always has beenโ€”Donald Trump. In 2008, Clinton did the hard thing and moved on from a contentious primary election. It was time. And it was the right thing to do.

Sanders should do the same.

6 replies on “What the Sanders Campaign Could Learn from the Clinton Campaign in ’08”

  1. I enjoyed your piece, even if I don’t agree with many of its premises. However, Sanders is not going to bow out and neither are we. There is too much at stake here, and if you want to get into the details, the votes are not in fact all in. The parallels you make between the 2008 campaign and now aren’t accurate, either. There were paper-thin differences between Clinton and Obama; that is very obviously not the case with Bernie Sanders. See Rolling Stone piece here, “This isn’t 2008” and “Sanders’ fight…” sections:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/new…

    I certainly want a female to become president; I just strongly do not want Hillary Clinton to become president because of who she is, not because of her gender. I and most other Sanders supporters urged Elizabeth Warren to run; she refused to. It is an important milestone, but by no means a good reason to let somebody become president. Not being a woman myself, I will let someone who is say it better than I can:

    https://medium.com/@shana_east/not-proud…

  2. Great piece Megan, and agree 100%. I waffled between Sanders and Clinton throughout the primary buildup, but now that Hillary is in, I’m totally on board. Hoping for a Clinton/Sanders ticket when the dust has settled.

  3. If you think Hillary is as bad as Trump, you’re locked in a groupthink mental prison. Grieve… that’s natural… then help us defeat the Orange Menace. This is serious shit, Trump will do serious damage to the country and the world. Seriously.

  4. Fear of Trump isn’t groupthink? The world’s gonna turn Todd, just with a few less people, due to their heads exploding. What’s crazy is Trump only ran for president to influence the judges and IRS.

  5. Bernie isn’t on the hook for 20 million in campaign debt & groveling for a position in the Admin, just for starters. She conceded with her trademark faux bs, after being paid off. Fact! #VoteGreen

Comments are closed.