
A new poll suggests that an overwhelming number of Portland voters support sweeping changes to the city’s form of government and elections systems.
The poll, commissioned by the racial justice nonprofit Building Power for Communities of Color and conducted by the Oakland-based firm FM3 Research, surveyed nearly 622 likely Portland voters on a range of questions regarding the state of the city and a range of potential reforms being considered by the Portland Charter Commission.
The commission, a group of 20 convened last year to recommend changes to the city’s charter, heard a presentation on the polling data Thursday night.
The report found that nearly eight in ten Portlanders surveyed said they believe that the city is on the wrong track compared to just 13 percent who believe it is on the right track — a huge shift from May 2020, when a plurality of 45 percent of Portlanders said the city was on the right track.
But changing the city’s anachronistic form of government and election systems could potentially change the political landscape quickly.
Portland is the only major city in the United States to still use a commission style of government, in which four city commissioners and a mayor are elected in citywide elections to run city bureaus as well as function as the city’s legislative body.
The poll found that 80 percent of respondents feel that the commission system is not serving the city well, with 56 percent responding that the system is serving Portland “not well at all.”
Fifty-one percent of poll respondents signaled that they support Portland moving to the more commonly used mayor-council form of government, in which the mayor would be responsible for running city bureaus and a city council would be responsible for setting legislative policy, while just 32 percent of respondents opposed such a switch.
Respondents similarly support a potential move to a council-manager form of government, in which the council would elect a city manager responsible for running city bureaus, by a similar margin.
Self-identified liberals, progressives, and more affluent Portlanders were more likely to support a change in government, though voters in every income bracket favored the change. Voters of color were also more likely to support moving to a different system of government, as were voters in north and east Portland.
There was even more uniform support for other changes that the charter commission has been mulling, including expanding the size of the council, electing council members from specific geographic districts, and electing multiple members from each district.
More than 70 percent of voters favor moving to a ranked choice voting system in which voters can rank candidates in order of preference instead of voting for just one candidate, a system currently in use in cities like San Francisco, New York, and Minneapolis.
A significant majority of voters also support electing multiple members from each geographic district — a less commonly used system, but one that proponents feel could further remove barriers to electoral success for historically marginalized communities.
All of these potential changes are meant to make the city’s government more representative of and responsive to voters and interest groups who have not historically been able to exercise power in more expensive citywide elections that tend to cater to the city’s median voter.
Cities that have recently adopted city council districts, like Seattle and Austin, have elected more diverse councils, both in terms of identity and ideology.
A shift to district representation could also comport with the principles that Portlanders say they value in the reform process. More than 85 percent of survey respondents said that accountability, transparency, and responsiveness are “very important” values for the city government, with efficiency and representativeness also valued highly.
Reform advocates say that accountability and responsiveness in particular would be increased in a system in which city council members are answerable to specific neighborhoods rather than the whole city.
It remains to be seen whether this level of support for changes to the city’s government and elections will hold when opponents of reform begin to make their case in the buildup to a potential set of referendums on the November ballot.
Self-identified moderate and conservative voters and voters on the west side of Portland expressed the most opposition to reform proposals in the FM3 poll.
Historically, Portlanders have been loath to move away from the commission system of government — rejecting numerous attempts to ditch the system. The most recent attempt came in 2007, when 76 percent of voters opted to keep the current system.
But there is reason to believe that this year might be different. Not only do the mayor and all current members of the city council support reform, but the level of dissatisfaction with the direction of the city and the current system highlighted by these poll numbers suggests that Portland voters might finally be ready for change.
The charter commission is currently taking public comment. It anticipates releasing its proposed amendments in June.

My question (and it is an honest question), is what do Portlandlers believe a conservative government would do? The Republicans do not care about people’s lives.
What would the do about the homelessness and crime?
Would they add more and more cops and create a more violent regime where homeless people are forcibly removed from the city, imprisoned (being homeless is not a crime, but all of the greed and lack of social services to those in need certainly are crimes against humanity), killed?
What would they do about the lack of housing?
What would they do about the dismal state of education that wouldn’t leave all of the disenfranchised and marginalized children in a worse situation than they are already in?
What would they do about gun violence and the murder rate and the violence (especially the police enacted violence against citizens)?
What would they do about the poverty?
What would they do about the serious lack of social services?
What, exactly would they do that would make Portland better? I really want to know.
Portland is a shit show right now, but do people honestly believe a conservative regime will come in and make it all better?
they don’t care much about ‘Better’
they Do care about ‘Under Control!’
They had a Strong Daddy
who may have Beat them
(when they ‘Deserved it’!)
& if
it was ‘good enough’ for Them
it’s Plenty Good for the Unruly
some peeps just Gotta color
Inside the lines. it’s why
they’re There. right?
see: Children of Men
where people Know
Their Place* it may
be a little Rough
but it’s
Under Control &
therefore Such a Comfort
*see also:
peeps throwing
themselves off tall
Buildings in the back-
ground en masse: Fascism.
it don’t gotta be ‘Better.’
or even make sense
missed
you.
I can’t help feel skeptical of the “findings” of this polling showing overwhelming support to change the system, 622 respondents doesn’t seem like a very large sample. My gut tells me a lot of the responses are rooted in the frustrations of the day and age we’re living through, with a splash of distain for our current Ted+Sam project. Given all of the loathing of our mayor, why would we want to move to system that gives the mayor even more power? I do believe some aspects of the reforms would be worth exploring (seats tied to districts, ranked choice ballots, and maybe additional seats). Insert “baby with the bathwater” cliché.
Perhaps the majority of respondents want change because they’ve had enough of their downtown being allowed to be trashed for months on end.
@5 Or maybe they never left the downtown while conducting the survey. Do you ever venture to the east side Higgy? Things are pretty trashed citywide, but I recognize that it’s not just a Portland phenomenon. This is where 40+ years of trickledown economics, endless wars, and a pandemic has brought us. The people who push for this change never seem to show any evidence that cities that do it differently function all that more equitably or have better outcomes across the spectrum. That is unless your only metric of success is that you don’t have see the results of the inequity in our society.