Straight men needed us for the first 2.3-million-or-so years that the genus, er, homo has been around. But now that we’re not living in caves, well…
“Homosexuality is bad thing. It used to be useful when we were cavemen and we needed people to guard the caves full of women and children. If I’m a guy out hunting, I want to leave someone back at the cave tending to my wife and kids, and I don’t want a normal guy having that kind of access to my wife and kids. So, in our evolution, you can see that there use to be a utility for homosexuality, but that was when we were cavemen and we aren’t cavemen anymore.”
So it looks like we’re going to be phased out—how would that work exactly?—unless we can find a way to make ourselves “useful” to National Organization of Marriage supporters like Randy Crawford here. Any ideas?

So a NOM idiot bases his argument on evolution, and clearly believes that sexuality is governed by genetics, not choice.
I’d call that a win for the good guys!
ps, AND he’s completely ok with gays watching his children. I LOVE this guy!
Well, SOMEONE had to decorate those caves.
Yet some are still as stupid as “cavemen”, if not more so.
No, Dan. I actually can not think of a single way I could or would want to be of service to a full-of-himself overprivileged white douchebag with a grade school education. Maybe I’m imagining things, but it was my understanding that people like this don’t generally believe in evolution.
Good God, I first read that as “NOW Supporter” thinking it was the National Organization for Women saying gays were useless.
Anyhow, NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM stupid teabaggers.
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnUfPQVOqpw…
Well, you can’t argue with science.
That’s just a spin on the ole’ Eunuch idea, set a few millions years earlier.