Before their recent transformation, the Seattle Weekly ran an editorial titled โ€œDonโ€™t Punch Nazisโ€”Yet,โ€ arguing that we have not reached a place where violence is an answer to fascismโ€”โ€œyet.โ€ [Eds. Note: The Seattle Weekly is/was the Seattle equivalent of the Mercuryโ€™s sworn enemy, Zippity News.]ย Citing vehicular homicide in Charlottesville, throat-slitting on passenger trains in Portland, and gunshots on the University of Washingtonโ€™s Red Square, others argue, as Primo Levi once wroteโ€”and Incubus once sangโ€”Seattle Weekly, if not now, when?

The debate about punching Nazis isnโ€™t new, as Mark Bray explains in Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook. The โ€œhandbook,โ€ which is really more of a textbook, describes how older Jews in the mid-1930s often criticized younger Jewish anti-fascist organizers who were โ€œcopying the Nazi violence which we loathe and detest.โ€ Their criticism did little to prevent the rising tide of fascism and the ensuing genocide. Our way of remembering this period, unfortunately, appears to be repeating this dead-end debate.

If weโ€™re going to keep this up, can we at least start talking about, as one organizer tabulated, โ€œthe 97 percent of anti-fascist activity that doesnโ€™t involve a violent confrontationโ€?

Brayโ€™sย Antifaย is a good place to start. The handbook offers readers their first โ€œtransnational history of postwar anti-fascism in English,โ€ and, according to Bray, their most comprehensive. When reading, itโ€™s quickly clear that violence is a final tactic treated as self-defense, and itโ€™s something antifa organizations quibble over, too. Reducing the entire range of anti-fascist activityโ€”which is overwhelmingly nonviolentโ€”to the question of a punch is far more dangerous than a fistfight.

When we focus on punching Nazis, we fail to celebrate nonviolent anti-racist organizing (which always was anti-fascist, according to historian Robert Paxton, who argues that fascism โ€œfunctionallyโ€ originates in America with the KKK); to laud the activists who convince private venues to reject white supremacist clients; and to think about the implications of doxxing white supremacists.

As he lectures on the history of European postwar antifa up to todayโ€™s antifa organizers in the Pacific Northwest, Bray touches on some of these things, as well as anti-Nazi punks, Italian feminist witches, and how the alt-right recruits dudes who likeย My Little Pony. (Seriously.) The latter half of the book reads like a Jehovahโ€™s Witnesses pamphlet, but instead of offering a Q&A about eternal salvation, Bray poses and answers questions such as โ€œAre Anti-Fascists Anti-Free Speech?โ€ (His short answer: Fascists arenโ€™t entitled to free speech, so nah nah nah.)

Itโ€™s unclear ifย Seattle Weeklyย will be able to update their โ€œdonโ€™t punch Nazisโ€ stance. That paper, as weโ€™ve known it, is now dead. But while we mull over the precise moment when โ€œdonโ€™tโ€ becomes โ€œdo,โ€ย Antifaย urges people to organize against fascism before it organizes against us.

Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook
by Mark Bray
(Melville House)