Credit: JAROMIR CHALABALA / EYEEM / GETTY IMAGES
1539303423-1523212109-gettyimages-767983053.jpg
JAROMIR CHALABALA / EYEEM / GETTY IMAGES

A unidentified man has died after being shot by a Portland police officer this afternoon.

According to the Portland Police Bureau (PPB), police officers were dispatched around 2 pm to SE Market and 96th, where a man was allegedly refusing to leave a house. Shortly after arriving at the residence, an unnamed officer fired his gun at the man. It’s unclear what prompted him to shoot, or if the man was armed.

The man was still alive when emergency medical staff showed up, but had died by the time they brought him to a hospital.

The officer involved is on paid administrative leave until an investigation into the shooting concludes.

“As with all officer-involved shootings, we are committed to a full investigation,” said PPB Chief Danielle Outlaw in a press statement. “A loss of life impacts us all and I know we all immediately search for answers. I ask for patience as we continue our investigative process and then release information as soon as it is appropriate.”

This isn’t the first shooting by a Portland police officer in 2019—but it is the first that resulted in a fatality. On January 2, a PPB officer fired his gun at a woman involved in a domestic violence disturbance in Northeast Portland. The woman allegedly charged at officers with a knife, prompting Officer Onest Robert to shoot. He missed.

Alex Zielinski is a former News Editor for the Portland Mercury. She's here to tell stories about economic inequities, cops, civil rights, and weird city politics that you should probably be paying attention...

4 replies on “Police Fatally Shoot Man in SE Portland”

  1. | This isn’t the first shooting by a Portland police officer in 2019

    It’s not a shooting if no one gets shot. The Jan. 2 incident would be discharge of a firearm. Important distinction for such a charged issue, I think.

  2. Wow, did the Mercury and Zielinski learn the lesson about sensational reporting that places blame before all the facts are in this time around? Unlike their prior stories on shootings, this one sticks to the known facts and won’t require a future retraction. Never thought I’d see the day…

  3. So by all accounts, it seems like the subject was a DRUG ADDICT TRANSIENT who was up to no good. As a result of this, Desmond’s property was damaged and he probably sustained psychological injuries.

Comments are closed.