A bill moving through the Oregon Legislature would give one trash incineration company a financial reward that's intended for clean energy producers. Environmental advocates are calling foul on the bill, and fighting to kill it before it goes to a vote.
Senate Bill 451 would allow companies that produce electricity from trash incineration to receive renewable energy credits, or RECs. Companies that earn RECs can sell them to utility providersâlike Portland General Electric, for exampleâwhich are required to meet state-mandated renewable energy goals. Essentially, SB 451 would make it possible for trash incinerators to cash in on incentives designed to reward clean energy producers like wind turbines and solar farms.
And thereâs only one trash incinerator in Oregon that would qualify under SB 451: Covanta, a national company with a facility near Salem. In fact, Sen. Lee Beyer, a Democrat from Springfield, introduced the bill on behalf of Covanta.
âWeâre talking about rewarding a trash incinerator,â says Damon Motz-Storey, a clean energy organizer with environmental advocacy group Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility (Oregon PSR). âBurning plastic⊠could be rewarded and defined as a renewable energy source.â
Oregon PSR is part of a coalition of Oregon environmental advocates who see the legislation as backwards. They argue that because Covanta produces greenhouse gasses that contribute to climate changeâas well as toxins associated with burning plasticâthe company shouldnât receive any benefits that are intended to encourage clean energy production.
According to 2017 data from the Department of Environmental Quality, Covanta is the 20th-highest producer of carbon dioxide in the state, emitting 160,000 metric tons of CO2 a year. The Metro Council decided to not contract with Covanta after a 2017 study brought up potential environmental concerns.
During the 2018 election cycle, Covanta donated to Governor Kate Brownâs campaign, and the campaigns of many prominent Democratic lawmakersâincluding Sen. Lee Beyer, who introduced the bill on Covantaâs behalf.
Motz-Storey sees SB 451 as being bigger than just allowing Covanta to earn money off of REC sales. It would also set what he calls a âdangerous precedentâ of classifying trash incineration as clean energy, which could have implications for future green legislation.
âWhat weâre seeing now is, theyâre making this big, impassioned push to qualify themselves as renewable energy, as the state is trying to bone up on its climate goals,â Motz-Storey says. â[It would be] really egregious behavior for a Democratic supermajority to reward that type of behavior.â
For Maria Hernandez-Segoviano, the policy and advocacy manager with environmental justice nonprofit OPAL, Covantaâs gambit to be recognized as a sustainable energy source isnât just a question of policyâitâs also an social justice issue. Covantaâs Oregon operation is in Brooks, a town about halfway between Salem and Woodburn. According to the Census 2017 American Community Survey, about 56 percent of Woodburn residents identify as Latino or Hispanic.
âIt has a huge impact to that community,â she says. âWe donât have to go outside of Oregon to know that typically these types of companies are often in communities with a lot of brown and Black folks.â
Last month, a Covanta spokesperson told the Salem Statesmen Journal that because garbage incinerators tend to emit less greenhouse gases than landfills, they deserve to be classified as a clean energy producer.
Linda Wallmark, a coordinator with the group Salem 350, told the Mercury that while the issue of incinerator versus landfill is âa very complicated issue,â she is âabsolutely certain [Covanta] is not a clean source of energy.â
âWe would have a net loss in carbon emissionsâ if Covanta closed shop in Oregon, Wallmark adds. "Covanta is the largest single-point emission of carbon dioxide in the county [Marion County]."
On Monday afternoon, the Senate Committee on Environment and Natural Resources voted without fanfare to refer SB 451 to the Senate Rules Committee, where a bill will typically either die or be passed directly to the senate floor. Every senator on the five-person committee voted in favor of passing the bill except for Sen. Floyd Prozanski.
During the 2018 election cycle, Covanta donated to Governor Kate Brownâs campaign, along with the campaigns of many prominent Democratic lawmakersâincluding Beyer, who introduced the bill on Covantaâs behalf. While the donation amounts arenât huge (Beyer, for example, received $2,000), they do raise a red flag for environmental advocates who oppose SB 451.
âWe need to question where their motives are coming from,â Motz-Storey says about Covanta. âAre they actually asking for this out of a noble sense that theyâre doing a public good? Or are they trying to get a special interest carveout?â