
Portlandâs homeless shelter providers will be the first to tell you that building more shelters is not the solution to ending the cityâs homelessness crisis.
âIt doesn't end homelessness. It relocates it,â says Andy Miller, director of nonprofit shelter provider Human Solutions. âWe always favor permanent housing over short-term shelter.â
Thatâs why some of the regionâs top shelter providers have come out strongly against a seemingly slapdash proposal from Mayor Ted Wheelerâs office to relocate thousands of unhoused Portlanders into mass shelters staffed by the national guard. The plan was originally introduced as three indoor shelters, each with 1,000 beds, but has since morphed into a proposal to create mass outdoor encampments.
The policy appears to be informed by people who have neither experienced homelessness nor worked with the unhoused community. Instead, it feels tailor-made for those who are more concerned about their property values plummeting due to the cityâs homeless encampments than the wellbeing of those sleeping outside.
Wheelerâs proposal has been framed as something of a last resort to address Portlandâs growing homeless crisis, with the mayor saying he will âleave no stone unturnedâ to solve the issue. But homeless service providers say Wheeler has had the ability to solve the cityâs homeless crisis for yearsâhe just hasnât taken the opportunity.
âThe city talks about âleaving no stone unturned,â and it doesnât feel like weâre actually doing that,â said Brandi Tuck, director of Portland Homeless Family Solutions, a shelter operator. âThere are a lot of proposals on the table [that are] proven to work. The city has just ignored them.â
Katrina Holland, the director of homeless service provider JOIN, agrees. She said that her organization and others have found success in âmaster leasingâ apartments to unhoused clientsâa process in which an organization makes an agreement with a private landlord to cover rent costs for formerly unhoused tenants. This agreement turns the organization into a go-between for the tenant and landlord, with organization staff members assisting tenants in reporting maintenance issues or working with landlords if any issues with the tenancy arise.
âThis puts people in housing within a matter of days,â says Holland.
And landlords are eager to sign on. According to Holland, JOIN received two requests from landlords in the past week offering to master lease apartment units to JOIN for unhoused Portlanders.
âThereâs a stereotype that landlords donât want to participate. Thatâs not true,â says Holland. âThese are private-market landlords who have specifically said theyâre willing to lower their screening criteria for tenants to make it work.â
Holland says sheâs offered to help the city partner with local landlords to consider master leasing some of Portlandâs empty apartment complexesâbut each time has been told by city staff that the idea is âtoo controversial.â
"The city talks about âleaving no stone unturned,â and it doesnât feel like weâre actually doing that.â
Homeless shelter providers also point to consistent longtime feedback from unhoused Portlanders that the best path towards housing for those living outside is placement in an autonomous outdoor village, like Northeast Portlandâs Dignity Village or the Rose Quarterâs Right 2 Dream Too. Itâs a suggestion that has come up again and again in the cityâs past attempts to police homelessness, most recently from those living in the C3PO Queer Affinity Village on SE Water Ave. After a nonprofit was appointed to oversee the previously self-run village, its residents expressed deep distrust and disappointment with the city.
âThe city says autonomous villages are a liability issue,â said Holland. âBut they think putting thousands of traumatized strangers in a shelter, living together, isnât a liability?â
While Wheeler says that moving unhoused people into mass outdoor shelters is a humane response, Tuck disagrees. Tuck explains that people experiencing homeless are often in a permanent state of âfight or flightââa stress response to danger that activates a personâs sympathetic nervous system.
âThat means you canât rely on the human functions of your brainâcognition, logical thinking, critical thinking, language and speech understanding,â Tuck says. âSo weâre talking about taking folks who are in survival mode and putting them all in mass shelters and expecting them to follow rules and get along with one another? Their brains are not capable of doing that. That exacerbates that distress response. We are creating neurobiological harm to these folks.â
While those who are most familiar with homelessness have raised alarms about Wheelerâs mass encampment plan, Portland City Hall has heard from many residents in the past week who strongly support Wheelerâs idea. But if the desire is to sweep unhoused people from public view, those residents should know this proposal isnât the answer.
Numerous studies have shown thereâs no proof that people who enter shelters are more likely to leave homelessness behind. A 2020 UCLA study on the effects of housing support on homeless recidivism found that a person was just as likely to remain homeless if they stayed in a shelter than if they refused to stay at one.
âAll this will be is a temporary detention,â says Tristia Bauman, an attorney at the National Homelessness Law Center (NHLC). âResearch tells us that most people in shelters will return to the streets. Itâs not going to solve the problem. Youâre going to continue to see people in public spaces, and youâre going to have wasted time and money.â
The same UCLA study found that the cost of short-term shelter housing was costlier than investments in permanent housing.
Of all the programs that shelter operator Portland Homeless Family Solutions offers to homeless Portlandersâfrom rent assistance to shelter bedsâTuck says the shelter programs consistently and âby farâ cost the most per person. Miller, with Human Solutions, suggests that the city take the money itâs hoping to use on mass outdoor shelters and instead use it to move the thousands of Portlanders currently living in Portland shelters into permanent housing.
âThousands of people in housing overnight,â Miller asks. âCan you imagine how impactful that would be?â
NHLCâs Bauman sees Wheelerâs proposal as an attempt to meet the requirements of the 2019 legal ruling Martin v Boise, which prohibits cities from penalizing people for sleeping outdoors if they are unable to access shelter.
âShelters can serve a harm-reducing purpose, but only if theyâre actually reducing harm.â
âIn the wake of the Martin decision, we have seen communities change law enforcement practices to avoid constitutional liability and create more temporary shelters,â says Bauman.
But the idea that cities can legally remove unhoused people from public spaces so long as the city provides adequate shelter space wonât protect cities from litigation, Bauman says. The Martin decision hinges on the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. If, for instance, someone with a serious mental illness is forced into a mass shelterâan environment that amplifies their illness and worsens their symptomsâthe city could still be liable for threatening that personâs Eighth Amendment rights.
âShelters can serve a harm-reducing purpose,â says Bauman. âBut only if theyâre actually reducing harm.â
While Portland has been experiencing a homelessness crisis since before Wheeler entered office, it wasnât until this month that the mayor has, with a sense of unusual urgency and purpose, decided to propose corralling unhoused people in mass shelters. While it may serve as a temporary salve to Portlanders who are eager to see homeless campers off the streets, itâs also a plan that will ultimately perpetuate the cityâs homelessness crisis.
Amid all the different, increasingly desperate proposals to lessen the homelessness crisis, it's worth noting that only a few of those have been unanimously opposed by those in and who work with the homeless community the most. As of now, no shelter providers or unhoused Portlanders have publicly supported Wheeler's plan.
If city leaders are serious about taking bold steps to address homelessness, they should look to the solutions that have been tested and endorsed by Portlanders with proven expertise and lived experience.