“Chicago could be a tough city for protests, just like Portland or Seattle,” recalls one of the fictitious government employees in Death of a President. He’s remembering a particularly rough day in Chicago: October 19, 2007, when protestors clogged the streets and two bullets slammed into the chest of George W. Bush.

Such is the inflammatory premise of Death of a President, a British mockumentary that imagines a future assassination of America’s not-so-beloved commander-in-chief. Blurring real footage and dramatized sequences, director Gabriel Range creates a faux documentary/faked historical document that feels eerily real; like some weird, time-traveling PBS special, the film’s vérité style and disconcertingly convincing performances lend it a disturbing air of veracity.

But then the film spins into an ill-inspired direction. Regardless of how one feels about him, the idea of Bush being assassinated is fascinating—politically, culturally, and emotionally. But instead of exploring those avenues, Death of a President turns into a lame Law & Order episode, focusing more on who killed Bush rather than what a dead Bush would mean for America and the world. That idea is something major, and interesting, and important—but instead of examining what a Bush assassination would really mean, the film chickens out, gradually turning into a tiresome, red herring-filled melodrama. Which is too bad—for all that Death of a President could have said, it ends up saying almost nothing at all.

Death of a President

dir. Range
Opens Fri Oct 27
Hollywood Theatre

With honor and distinction, Erik Henriksen served as the executive editor of the Portland Mercury from 2004 to 2020. He can now be found at henriksenactual.com.