
… because the summer wasn’t in need of saving.
Over the weekend, my social feeds blew up with peoples’ love for Marvel’s latestโwhich was pretty delightful to see, because the movie’s fantastic. But along with everyone’s newfound affection for Groot and Rocket came an unexpectedly pervasive sentiment: That Guardians of the Galaxy “saved the summer” by delivering solid, fun blockbuster action, which apparently wasn’t anywhere else to be found this summer? Even writer Joe Hill got into it:
Has been said elsewhere, but is worth repeating: the bad box office overall this summer has to do with a mess of shit pictures.
โ Joe Hill (@joe_hill) August 3, 2014
There’s no reason to overanalyze it. If the writing is consistently better on AMC, FX, NetFlix & HBO, people will stay home. Sorry.
โ Joe Hill (@joe_hill) August 3, 2014
I don’t mean to pick on Hill, because I like his work quite a bit and he’s hardly alone in pointing out the TV-versus-film thing. But just because TV doesn’t suck anymore doesn’t mean that film has suffered; as far as movies go, this year’s already been pretty great.
Hell, even if we look past the arthouse-ier, indie-style stuff that’s been phenomenal this year (Only Lovers Left Alive, Obvious Child, Boyhood, The Rover, The Grand Budapest Hotel) and only look at the bigger, blockbuster-ier type of movies that are more in Guardians‘ neighborhood? It’s still been a really solid summer:
Edge of Tomorrowโ”A fun, funny action movie with science-fiction smarts, deft satire, a nail-biter of a plot, and lots of cool explosions,” Ned Lannamann declared, like a happy king. “If you see a better popcorn movie this summer, it’s going to be a very good summer indeed.” Currently screening at the Laurelhurst Theater, Academy Theater, Kennedy School, OMSI Empirical Theater, Mission Theater, and more.
22 Jump StreetโThere are still some people who haven’t heard that the Jump Street movies are great? Or who refuse to believe it? These are people worth pitying. Century Eastport 16, Bridgeport Village Stadium 18, Fox Tower 10.
SnowpiercerโBong Joon-ho’s sci-fi allegory was a hit in the few theaters it was released in and on VODโbut if it had been in more theaters and had gotten more of an advertising push, it could’ve been exactly the sort of mainstream movie for grown-ups that grown-ups are always whining about not having. Hollywood Theatre, On Demand.
Dawn of the Planet of the ApesโOkay, probably not the funnest summer blockbuster, in that it’s a brutal reminder that the world is a dark, vicious place where even the most admirable among us have no other choice but to declare moral bankruptcy in order to survive. But once you get past that, hey, monkeys with guns! Various Theaters.
X-Men: Days of Future PastโAgainst every single odd in the universe, the 4,653rd X-sequel was clever and inventive and delivered precisely the right amounts of Wolverine slicing stuff up and Patrick Stewart ominously monologuing. Fox Tower 10, Lloyd Mall 8.
How to Train Your Dragon 2โ”One more rousing success like this,” says Eric D. Snider, “and How to Train Your Dragon will be the second-best animated trilogy in history. (Nothing’s gonna touch Toy Story, sorry.)” HIGH PRAISE. Various Theaters.
Yeah, Guardians of the Galaxy closed out blockbuster season in grand style. But if you think it saved a lackluster summer? You’ve got a lot of catching up to do.

Except for X-men, none of those are “blockbusters” by any normal definition of the term. And X-men came out like 4 months ago. So it’s no wonder that people think that Hollywood took a pass on this year’s blockbuster season.
@guspasho: How about you define blockbuster for us so that we’re all on the same page.
A movie that even those of us who don’t care that much about movies and don’t watch TV (read: me) can’t escape hearing about.
I barely know what Edge of Tomorrow and Dawn of Planet of the Apes are, and only because I saw the previews for them during X-men. Other than that I heard Dawn got some bad reviews. I’ve heard of 21 Jump Street the TV show, and I’m guessing I missed the first movie and they’re incrementing the number in a maddeningly inaccurate style a la Ocean’s 12+ (where’s 1-20 Jump Streets, god dammit???) I heard of How to Train Your Dragon, but I didn’t realize they made a movie of it, and I never heard of Snowpiercer before this post.
That’s the sum total of my incidental exposure to these so-called “blockbusters”. I don’t recall seeing any special slurpee cups with lids shaped to look like apes or dragons or edges or jumps or snowpiercers or whatever at 7-11.
Do you only pull your head out of the sand to get slurpees? And if you don’t care about movies then why are you wasting your time whining about an article about them? This question is rhetorical.
@guspasho: So your definition of ‘blockbuster’ is just a description of how narcissistic you are.
Seems to me this summer has been pretty good for quality movies … minus all the micheal bay, of course.
Godzilla was pretty good, as was Purge 2
Blockbuster is typically defined as a movie that breaks $100M isn’t it?
Woah, people liked How to Train Your Dragon 2? I heard it was a sappy piece of shit.
I thought the Ice Age movies were really good. Better than Toy Story, IMO. For what that’s worth.
I tried to come up with a way of defining “Blockbuster” based on gross revenue compared to median household income coupled with a percentage ROI so that, say, GODZILLA 1998 didn’t qualify, but then I decided to get a life instead. So y’all figure it out.
Okay but besides Snowpiercer none of the movies you listed were on par or as exceptional as guardians.