ON THURSDAY AFTERNOON, July 24, Commissioner Sam Adams hunkered down in city hall’s Rose Room around a massive conference table, with some of his closest advisors.

The groupโ€”the Safe, Sound, and Green Streets executive committeeโ€”examined the results of a hot-off-the-presses poll, and decided to pull the plug on one of Adams’ most ambitious proposals to date, a $464 million package of projects to address the city’s “unmet transportation maintenance and safety needs.”

Adams had been pushing the plan since last year, making the rounds in neighborhoods to explain how it would workโ€”the money would come from a $4.54 per month fee tacked onto city water bills, plus a gas tax increaseโ€”and to tout the projects in the proposal, a list crafted in part by an 89-member stakeholder committee.

The plan included $340 million in repaving projects on busy arterials like Alberta, Burnside, MLK, Grand, Hawthorne, and Lombard. There was $24 million for bike corridors, and more for fixes for high-crash intersections and citywide signal optimization. Another $12.4 million would have put sidewalks on streets that don’t currently have them.

But all of those projects will be shelved.

In February, as the council prepared to enact the plan, oil lobbyists targeted the proposalโ€”and the fees it would place on high-traffic businesses like gas stationsโ€”and threatened to refer it to the ballot if the city council passed it.

Adams pulled back, and pledged to look into putting it on the November ballot directly. But the recent poll showed that “going to the voters at this time would be very problematic,” pollster Adam Davis says.

The poll Adams’ office commissioned showed that 29 percent of voters polled named “transportation” as the city’s most pressing concernโ€”a change from the usual top concern, which has traditionally been education, notes Davis.

But while voters are currently concerned about transportation, they weren’t willing to fund fixes in a wide enough margin to pass the measure in November, Adams says. Only 55 percent of those polled supported the monthly $4.54 “street maintenance fee,” with a six-point margin of error.

The plan now? To “not put a measure on the November ballot, to delay implementing Safe, Sound, and Green Streets, and to focus our efforts on the next state legislature,” Adams says. “We will wait for the economy to get better. In the meantime, hopefully we will get some help from the state” to tackle pressing transportation concerns.

Adams will also ask the city council to allocate an unexpected bump in “utility license fees” (ULF)โ€”the cash the city collects on gas and electric bills, which will increase by “$4.3 and 6.3 million a year,” Adams says, thanks to impending utility rate increasesโ€”to transportation maintenance. The city’s Department of Transportation (PDOT) is facing a $4.3 million budget shortfall next year alone, says PDOT head Sue Keil.

Next year, Keil explains, she’ll need to find $4.3 million in cuts, thanks to gas tax revenue shortfalls and the increased price of everything from asphalt to employees’ health care. Instead of trimming back the already squeezed transportation department, Adams wants to dedicate the city’s windfall of ULF money to her bureau to avoid cuts.

That $4.3 million “is not even a band-aid,” says Ken Turker with the Eastport Shopping Center, a small business rep on the Safe, Sound, and Green Streets executive committee. “We’re still going backward all the time.”

8 replies on “Dead End”

  1. this is great. i just spent 11 weeks on crutches because i stepped off a curb and landed on the edge of a pothole, and rolled and broke my foot. have you been to northwest lately… at least we have a tram, and a new max line that runs right parallel to the streetcar line. thanks a lot, butt hole.

  2. Nobody actually wants the streets to be safe. There would be nothing to complain about. Some of the bike vs. car drama might even disappear. Nobody ever wants to pay for keeping their streets or neighborhoods clean and safe. Blowing money on dangerous things is more important.

  3. Hmmm maybe we should look at slowing growth in Portland down a bit… The economy is dragging a bit but is def. no recession. And personally we do not need any more incentive for people to ride bikes in a busy downtown… Those goofy green boxes crack me up. I agree our streets do need attention but honestly you can’t go fast enough to do any real damage… Unless your walking I guess. I urge all motorcycle riders to take advantage of our green boxes for motorized bikes they work great. Cheers!

  4. Hey, I have a bright idea-
    why don’t they get the money from taking back the ILLEGAL PROFITS made by the new construction in the PEARL that was supposed to go to affordable housing, instead of the luxury apartments they sold as???

Comments are closed.