I admit, I may have been the tiniest bit overeager, but still⌠After all the preliminary hype about Roseanne (if not Roseanne) being pro-Trump, it appears the subject was mostly enlisted in service of a feud subplotâand one really good jokeâbetween Roseanne and her sister Jackie.
The idea of the beloved '90s sitcom, which may have been the last piece of pop culture to convincingly unite liberal values with a working class milieu, becoming a platform for Barr to shill for the current president has made a lot of people swear never to watch this reboot, which is, in a way, totally understandable. Life is short. I don't want to hear his fucking name again either. (And by the way, you don't, at least not in the first two episodes.) If I didnât consider it to be the greatest sitcom ever on TV I probably wouldnât have stayed up till 2am for Hulu to start streaming it.
In which case we all would have been lonely. According to ABC (via Vulture), the two premiere episodes drew over 18 million viewers. For comparison, the Will and Grace reboot drew about 10 million. The most recent season premiere of The Walking Dead drew 11 million. The most recent season finale of Game of Thrones drew 12. Oh, and, the 1997 series finale of Old Roseanne drew about 17 million.
I don't know about the rest of the 18 million viewers, but Iâm glad I stayed up. The first episode was a little clunky, but, like an old car, it got running pretty good once the gunk burned off. Episode two was excellent.
The weirdest thing about the Roseanne reboot isnât the way the actors look; itâs the way they sound. Roseanne Barrâs voice, which used to fly between the poles of sarcastic complaint and full-blown tantrum, seems to have been mood-stabilized. John Goodmanâs Chicago baritone has gotten gruff and growly. Sara Gilbert is no longer doing the patented Darlene drone. Lecy Geranson has dropped almost an octave. Only Laurie Metcalf sounds the same as she did during the seriesâ heyday.
None of these are meant as judgments. It was just that everything else was so familiar that the change to the showâs musicâan under-explored element of sitcom creationâwas a little disorienting.
As was the crowbarring in of hyper-intentionally relevant topics like Roseanne and Jackie feuding over the formerâs support of Trump (whose name is never spoken, though his famous slogan is), and the latterâs presumed backing of Hillary Clintonâwhich yields the best joke in episode one, though Jackieâs already-anachronistic pussy hat and Nasty Woman t-shirt feel uncharacteristically burlesque after about 10 seconds.
But Roseanne was only ever nominally driven by âissues.â Itâs true that unemployment, underemployment, and later LGBTQ struggles provided conflict and context, but the real engine of the comedy and the drama was always the relationships between the extended Conner family. (It didnât hurt that two of them were and are a couple of the greatest actors alive.) That engine proved to be in excellent working order once they dispensed with establishing whatâs new in the showâs universe, namely:
Roseanne drives an Uber; Dan appears to be retired somehow; Darlene has lost her job and is living back at home with her two kids, one of whom is exploring early stages of gender non-conformity; Becky, a widow, works as a server but is trying to line up a sweet deal to be a surrogate mother for one of Lanfordâs elusive rich peopleâplayed, cleverly enough, by Sarah Chalke, who played the other Becky for a couple of yearsâfor a $50,000 fee; DJ is a veteran with a young, black daughter and a wife still serving in Syria; Jackie is now a life coach.
But thatâs all just backdrop. The main attraction is Roseanne and Danâs mean/romantic banter, Becky and Darlene mocking each other like they always did, Jackieâs persistence in the face of never being taken seriously (and her delivery of the word âjourneysâ). By episode two, everyone seems to have remembered how to be right back where they belong.
The gag with Dan and Roseanne dividing up the prescription medicine they can afford with their insufficient insurance is pretty good, but only because itâs a delivery device for their unorthodox version of connubial devotion. The real Roseanne Barr may have changed in all manner of waysâsocial, political, surgicalâbut her talent for being the anchor of an endearingly familiar (and intriguingly alien) TV family remains delightfully intact.
The fact that some of them (one of them, anyway) are wrong about important things (one important thing, anyway) may turn out to be a feature, not a bug, not only because itâs inherently valuable to be exposed to that particular brand of wrongness given form by someone who has been right about other things, but because itâs a good feeling to remember that itâs possible to feel love and respect for people you disagree with.