Knock, Knock, Who's There? Taxing the Rich! 

Grassroots Group Knocks Doors for Popular New Taxes

news1-maggy.jpg

Illustration by Zack Soto

FORMER US senatorial candidate Steve Novick had one of the best campaign days of his life on Saturday, October 3. Going door to door in the Creston-Kenilworth neighborhood south of Powell, Novick encouraged voters to support new taxes that will be up for a statewide vote in January. A man with several missing teeth living in a shabby apartment complex enthusiastically signed a pledge to vote yes. "If you have half a brain, you'd have to vote yes," said the man.

"I swear I didn't pay him to say that," said Novick, checking the name off his list as he headed down the street. At the next door, a lawyer in a Patagonia fleece also immediately agreed to vote yes on the tax measures, which will modestly raise taxes on corporations and the 1.7 wealthiest percent of Oregonians. "I'm a corporation and I would love to pay more taxes," she said.

While Oregon has an anti-tax reputation, apparently some residents are coming around to the idea. Two-thirds of corporations in Oregon pay only $10 in state taxes, an amount set in 1931, according to Novick's campaign group, Defend Oregon. Faced with a $4 billion budget hole last spring, the legislature barely passed two tax hikes on corporations and wealthy individuals after heated debate. Altogether, the new taxes will bring in $733 million for the state.

But a subtly named group called "Oregonians Against Job-Killing Taxes" shelled out $550,000 to paid signature gatherers over the summer, collecting enough names to put the new taxes up for a statewide referendum in a special January election.

Though a poll in August revealed that Oregonians support higher taxes on corporations and the rich by a two-to-one margin, the anti-tax campaign has deep pockets. Their war chest holds over $1.2 million, which the group is spending on high-powered lobbyists and TV advertisements.

Under the gray Saturday morning sky, campaign coordinator Liz McCann gave a pro-tax pep talk to the 30 volunteers eating bagels and preparing to canvass the Southeast Portland neighborhood. "The average family in Oregon pays $3,100 in income tax. That's 300 times higher than the corporate tax," said McCann, to a chorus of hisses.

The first bill that's up for referendum in January will raise income taxes on couples that make over $250,000; the second raises the corporate minimum tax from the rate set in 1931. Eighty-eight percent of Oregon businesses will pay a $150 annual fee, while the rest will pay up to $100,0000 depending on their income, plus a higher income tax.

Without the tax increases, Oregonians are in trouble, says Novick. "If everything gets hit proportionally, it would be the equivalent of 2,000 old people losing care and 20,000 children losing health-care coverage," he predicts.

The Oregon Legislative Revenue Office agrees, issuing a report last week that says the new taxes will lead to a rise in income for most households in Oregon. If Oregonians repeal the measure, the state will have to slash education, human services, and public safety budgets, says the report.

Tax foes, of course, disagree.

"This hurts the kinds of businesses that Oregon should be trying to support," says Oregonians Against Job-Killing Taxes spokesman Pat McCormick, pointing out that gas stations, timber companies, and other high-volume companies will be hit hardest by the new corporate income taxes. He thinks the legislature should tap existing reserves before placing higher taxes on businesses. "They have lots of options in front of them. At a time when Oregon is in the middle of a recession, it does not make any sense to be raising taxes," says McCormick.

Timber, paper, and oil companies have donated over $400,000 to the anti-tax campaign. The biggest single donor is Columbia Sportswear President and Reed College trustee Timothy Boyle, who gave $10,000 (and who falls into the "weathiest 1.7 percent of Oregonians" catagory). The campaign altogether has spent more than twice as much as Defend Oregon, which is hoping to win at the ballot box in January with the help of mostly volunteer canvassers.

McCann reminded the crowd of 30 coffee-sipping doorknockers on Saturday morning to introduce themselves as volunteers. "Face-to-face, door-to-door contact—you can't pay for the impact of that kind of communication," she said.

Novick, at least, easily struck gold.

Comments (6) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 6

Add a comment | All comments »

Wow, Tim Boyle is a prick. Another good reason to boycott Columbia products. Hey Reedies, maybe you guys should have some sort of outing/protest of Tim Boyle being FOR cutting education, human services, and public safety budgets...Public shaming of these greedy fucks is about the only way we have to keep them accountable.

Posted by solid gold on October 8, 2009 at 2:14 PM | Report this comment

These rich pricks are SO GOOD at fooling the DUMBASS americans around us, that actually VOTE AGAINST their own interests because they actually believe the anti tax crowd.

It's so sad to watch the public voting to destroy itself.

Propaganda, it works!

Posted by Al M on October 11, 2009 at 6:02 PM | Report this comment

I'll give y'all an example of just how STUPID some people are.
I work at TRIMET and I know LOTS OF PEOPLE who work there that are ANTI GOVERNMENT!

That's fight folks, people who work for the government are SO FREAKING STUPID that they are anti government in their politics, and of course ANTI UNION.

In other words, the believe in a philosophy that WOULD PUT THEM OUT OF WORK.

Posted by Al M on October 11, 2009 at 6:07 PM | Report this comment

Why should we be encouraging gas stations and timber companies?

I know that there are alot of Oregonians that are employed in the forest product industry in this state. But those folks aren't getting any tax break and there are just as many Oregonians who have lost their jobs in this industry, jobs that won't be coming back, no matter how much of our tax money we allow GP, Weyerhauser, IP, ITT, Menashe Corporation etc. to funnel back to their shareholders.

These people already pay less than their fair share in taxes on their income from those shares.

Posted by oliver on October 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM | Report this comment

Corporations paying $10 a year? Screw that! I don't want to see businesses taxed to the point where they go under or leave the state, but they should at least pay a fair portion of the tax revenue... after all, they benefit from the services just like everyone else.

Corporations need to invest in the states infrastructure so we can educate our kids, pave roads, etc so we don't restrict the future flow of people and goods into companies years later.

Posted by Kerry on October 14, 2009 at 4:52 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

From the Archives

  • Unsafe Streets

    While city makes cycling downtown safer, one road in Northeast claims two serious bike collisions in one week.
    • Sep 3, 2009
  • Eyes on 2012

    Gay marriage advocates push conversation, not conversion.
    • Aug 20, 2009
  • More»

Author Archives

Most Commented On

  • Testing Craigslist

    Undercover with Portland's housing discrimination police.
    • Nov 5, 2009
  • Black and Blue

    Gresham's only black cop resigns post, alleging discrimination.
    • Nov 5, 2009
  • More»

Top Viewed Stories

  • Bad Apple Reputation

    A new lawsuit hangs over the cop involved in the death of James Chasse.
    • Jan 29, 2009
  • Pay Back

    A freelance writer drags PDX Magazine to court over back pay.
    • Aug 28, 2008
  • More»

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

Need Scooter Service?
We sell and repair scooters, and have a full service department specializing in Chinese brand scooters; we work on all brands of scooters, however.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

605 NE 21st Ave
Portland, OR 97232

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use