JUST PAST SIX in the morning outside of the Green Dragon pub
in Southeast Portland, Brian Butenschoenโ€”president of the Oregon
Brewers Guildโ€”stands in the light drizzle beside a rented
minivan.

Butenschoen has organized a small convoy to travel to Salem to
witness the first legislative hearing for House Bill 2461โ€”which,
if passed, would increase excise taxes for beer producers in Oregon.
Soon, a small group of beer advocates has assembled. Butenschoen gives
the word and they point themselves toward the state capital.

People on both sides of the beer tax issue consider these hearings a
kind of tradition. For the past five legislative sessions, a beer tax
has been proposed and summarily defeated. Some blame a powerful beer
lobby; others credit a tax-shy constituency. For Butenschoen, it’s an
old gameโ€”this will be his third hearing on such a tax
proposalโ€”but defeating a beer tax may be more difficult this
year.

Recently, the Oregon legislature learned it was staring down the
barrel of a $3 billion budget deficit for the next two years. With the
economy still in dire straits, lawmakers are looking for any source of
revenue that would keep vital services funded.

State Representative Ben Cannon adopted HB 2461 from State Senator
Jackie Dingfelder, who failed several times to pass a similar bill. In
Cannon’s hands the proposed tax has increased significantly.

Currently, Oregon brewers pay $2.60 in taxes on every barrel of beer
(31 gallons) they produceโ€”one of the lowest beer taxes in the US.
Cannon’s bill increases that tax, which hasn’t changed since 1977, by
$49.61. The total tax burden to Oregon brewers would be $52.21 per
barrel.

Brewers say this nearly 2,000 percent increase would wreak havoc on
an industry that provides 5,200 jobs in Oregon. Bill proponents say
that the tax would immediately free up $114 million normally spent on
addiction recovery and prevention services.

Jamie Floyd of Ninkasi Brewing is riding shotgun in Butenschoen’s
minivan. He’s scheduled to testify at the hearing but he’s quite calm.
I ask how the tax would affect his brewery. He takes the chance to
rehearse a part of his speech.

“If this tax increase happens, 25 percent of the cost of every keg I
produce would go to the government,” he tells me. “We operate based on
loans. No bank is going to look at that and give us financing.”

Suddenly a car whizzes past, driven by Christian Ettinger of
Hopworks Urban Brewery. Its license plate reads HOP WRK. Butenschoen
pulls the minivan in line and waves while Ettinger and Floyd make faces
at each other through the windows.

At the capitol building, everyone makes their way to the hearing
room.

Representative Cannon and Senator Dingfelder are the first to
testify. Cannon calls the tax “fundamentally fair” and argues that the
cost to the consumer will only be around 20 cents per pint.

Dingfelder suggests that the beer tax is the most appropriate way to
handle Oregon’s underage drinking problem, which has reached “epidemic
proportions.”

Kurt Widmer, Floyd, and Ettinger testify afterward. Ettinger tells
the committee that if the tax were raised, he would move a proposed
second location for Hopworks to Washington. Floyd speeds through his
speech, obviously frustrated, asking, “Should people drive to
Washington to buy beer?”

In a brief question-and-answer period, Widmer counters the claim
that HB 2461 would only raise the price of a pint by 20 cents.
According to his calculations, the increase at the tap would be closer
to $1.25, much of which has to do with distributors and restaurants
trying to maintain profit margins. “We got [our estimate] based on what
distributors have historically done,” he tells the panel of
legislators.

Much of the hearing is occupied by testimony from advocates of
addiction recovery services. The testimony is often moving and
uncomfortable. One recovering alcoholic describes the difficulty of
raising a young boy already fascinated with booze.

Brewers discuss the finer points of the local beer market and tax
advocates talk about the ravages of meth amphetamine and drunkenness.
It doesn’t seem like they should be connected, but they’re linked by HB
2461.

The hearing has filled two large rooms and spills out into the
halls. Short on time and only halfway through the witness list, the
committee extends proceedings to Wednesday, February 25.

With such passion from both sides and a budget gap looming, it’s
difficult to guess the outcome. Back at the van, Butenschoen is
optimistic. So is Floyd, but their fate still hangs in the balance.

As the crew piles in, someone says, “After all that, I could use a
beer right now.” It’s a long ride home to get one.

6 replies on “Mr. Beer Goes to Salem”

  1. Or people could start brewing their own damn beer, like my husband. It took only his second batch to create a delicious IPA clone, and he’s done many types since. We share them with friends and family, and save a lot of money on otherwise pricey boutique beers. Go Brewmasters!

  2. Let’s not kid ourselves. The beer tax would raise the price of beer by $1-1.50 per pint without a doubt. To say anything less is just dishonest. And to levee a 2000% tax increase on one of the last thriving industries in Oregon is so wrong-headed it’s astounding. Why penalize the craft beer industry to pay for the for the evils of drug and liquor abuse? It makes no sense. It’s been proven time and time again that alcoholics abuse Hard Liquors. And Craft Beer is hardly a gateway to drug addiction. This bill is just proof of how short sighted the legislature is. Sure they can pass this bill, then raise the tax and raise some short term money, but what happens when they drive most craft brewers out of business? Where then will the state find money to fund drug and alcohol treatment? How about thinking outside of the box and levee taxes on things that really damage or kill people: How about raising taxes on Fatty food? How about an increase on cigarette and hard liquor taxes? How about a $1/per bullet tax? How about taxes on all the necessary items needed to make Meth? How about increased taxes on industries that pollute? Or maybe venture into true leadership and legalize pot –and then tax the death out of that. Any of these would probably raise far more cash than the shortsighted foolishness of an unfair tax levee that would kill the state’s most unique and greatest industry: Craft beer making.

  3. This is ridiculous. You can’t escape this issue by proposing that people just drink Bud, or start homebrewing.
    For one, part of Portland’s, and moreover Oregon’s, economic and cultural identity is that of having a thriving craft-beer scene. Bud is Bud, it is NOT a craft beer, and it will never satisfy the need to escape all the homogenized “American-style” beers. I know that part of the reason I love Oregon is the endless number of craft breweries available, and I can tell you that Oregon is unique in its craft beer diversity.
    Second, homebrewing is great, but people that homebrew by and large derive inspiration from craft breweries (and to some extent vice-versa), so keep homebrewing, but don’t kill the industry that supports it. Not to mention that homebrewing costs only a little bit less (approx $40 for a batch that yields 48 12 oz. beers) than buying craft beer by the bottle.
    Most importantly, this measure is clearly a hasty attempt to address the budget issue simply by repackaging a bill that has been defeated before, and tacking alcoholism and drug use on as an emotional way to lure voters into approval. This is the same bulls**t scare-tactic rhetoric that got the US into many of its short-sighted battles, and it will have the effect of eliminating one of Oregon’s most important small business industries while only providing a marginal amount of increased funds for addiction related programs. Now, don’t get me wrong alcohol and drug addiction is important, but I don’t see this 2000% per barrel increase on brewers as a “fundamentally fair” way of addressing a problem that is more linked to liquor production than it is to beer – it will have a disproportionate effect on the beer industry, and on small businesses in particular.

  4. well said, pdx32. i propose that we levy a 2000% tax increase on Coca Cola and PepsiCo to battle the obesity epidemic. a TRUE epidemic! (not that substance addiction is not an important cause, to be sure.) think that would fly?? at least beer has nutritional value. who’s with me on this?

  5. Well I am not one for microbrews, but I have had a few here and there and for the most part, they are pretty good.

    My favorite beer is Bud. One of the only things I have in common with Kip……… uugggghhhhh.

    And speaking of the dope smoking hippies, Kip, the only difference between the ones making the beer and you is actually making the beer.

Comments are closed.