THE WUNDERKAMMER or “cabinets of curiosity,” they’re calledโold-timey collections of things that defy category and evoke wonder. In the case of Chelsea Lynn Linehan and Nathanael Thayer Moss’ collaborative show, Emperical Geodism, the intended Wunderkammer is a group of sculptures, paintings, and illustrations that explore geometry in organic and inorganic forms, depicting crystals and abstract design riffs while trying to establish themes of “societal superstructure.” Ambitious, aye?
“Presbycusis,” Moss’ largest piece in the show, is a mural drawn in neon green tape on a gallery wall. If you can imagine a topographical map for an 8-bit terrain, you’ll get somewhere close to Moss’ mural: Continuous lines wrap around a spattering of sharp, abstracted shapes, looking equally like circuitry and something from a puzzle book. Here, Moss says he’s thinking about sloppily planned cities and infrastructuresโparticularly, how these relate symbolically to messy social systems.
The analogs to this topographical “imperfect city” are Linehan’s crystals and geodes. In “Sweetish Astringent Taste,” Linehan combines paper, gouache, acrylic, and wood to create a solid-white 3D illustration of crystals, which stand like skyscrapers, jutting outward aggressively. Linehan describes the connection between cities growing on the earth’s surface, and caves of giant geodes growing underneath, finding a place where organic and inorganic geometry mirror one another.
In keeping with the Wunderkammer theme, a large part of the goal is to create wonder and intrigue. Moss’ “Microphonic Spectrum Analysis” does just that: Neon rays radiate from a central point, while boxy, interconnected shapes stutter and glitch away from it. Moss tells me that the idea was to invent something like an abstracted microscopic circuitryโin his words, an “unclear smoke signal,” used to arrest the viewer with its ambiguity.
While the impulse to produce wonder through ambiguity is playful and fun, it seems to be prioritized over an elegant conceptual conclusion. Emperical Geodism‘s artist statement concludes, “The bare aggregation, infrastructure, and biomorphic qualities remain as the iconography,” which could just as easily read something like, “the collection of objects are symbolic.” That’s some vague stuff, though the artists admit that the whole thing was a bit sarcastic to begin withโpoking fun at spiritual crystal huntersโand this sarcasm might have been extended to the conceptual elements. Even if the show builds to a frustrating non-statement, it succeeds as a Wunderkammer, as well as at the aesthetic level. You can view the show in person by setting up an appointment with charles@tractorpdx.com.

Reminds me of Escher on lsd in a sorbet shop. Fun to gaze upon but hard to see. Love the colors. Dont see continuous lines wrapping around abstract shapes as much as abstract shapes piercing continuous lines. Its hard to write about art sometimes. Sometimes you have to do more than just walk past it. Sometimes you have to stare at it for hours or live with it to undestand it.Sometimes you will never understand it. A.T.Sheppard
@sheps22 “Dont see continuous lines wrapping around abstract shapes as much as abstract shapes piercing continuous lines. Its hard to write about art sometimes.”
I wasn’t referring to piece pictured above. You’d know that if you read the description carefully: “[the] mural is drawn in neon green tape on a gallery wall.” Its hard to read sometimes.