lt_guy.jpg

It’s been more than the year since a nonprofit group that for years helped organize Alberta’s Last Thursday festival held a press conference to announce they were quitting.

Friends of Last Thursday (FoLT) resigned over new strictures on the freewheeling event proposed by Mayor Charlie Hales—changes that have since been realized—and left the mayor’s office looking for another organization to take up the cause.

Now that organization is perhaps in the works. Michael O’Connor, a former FoLT member who took off in 2012 to begin a new street fair in southeast, sent out a release Monday night announcing a fundraiser this week for a new organizing group.

“Our current vision is to form an organization of artists, musicians, performers, and fun makers,” O’Connor wrote.
“These are the people that make Last Thursday the incredible event that it is.”

O’Connor says the group he has in mind will oversee the “infrastructure, management, and support needed to make Last Thursday the best that it can be.” It would use grants and fundraising, apparently, to cover the sizable costs associated with Last Thursday. Hales’ office estimates the city spent $75,000-80,000 running the event last year.

O’Connor also takes exception with Hales’ handling of the event recently. He writes: “In particular, the City recently began fining musicians who can be heard from 150 feet away, and plans to charge participants fees and collect their personal information. We believe that a better solution is possible, and we will do everything we can to alleviate the City’s concerns while preserving the rights of our community.”

But it’s unclear whether the mayor’s office would be willing to let its new regulations lapse. Officials and some neighbors view them as valuable to toning down what can be a raucous and problematic event. O’Connor says he’s been in frequent contact with the mayor’s office, and that he’s not aware of any conditions on his group’s stewardship. He says he’ll push for different solutions than those the mayor has imposed.

“Any conditions they set, they’ll have to have a legal right to do so,” he tells the Mercury. “We have legal representation through the ACLU that is helping us make sure.”

The group is holding a fundraiser at 7 pm on Thursday at two Alberta bars, The Knock Back and Cruzroom, hoping to raise $600 to register with the state and federal government and set up a website.

Update, 3:30 pm: The mayor’s office says it’s true O’Connor has called and e-mailed about his ideas. He even had an attorney call. But Hales’ staff will need to see financial legitimacy before handing over the reins of last Thursday, says Policy Assistant Chad Stover.

“What it boils down to, for my side, is clearly understanding the logistics and the costs,” Stover says. “We need a group that can step up and has the appropriate funding capabilities.”

Just what all that means is sort of up in the air, Stover says. Police details for the event cost less now that Last Thursday ends an hour earlier, and there may be less police required overall. It’s not clear exactly what costs will be associated with the event going forward, right now, so demanding a specific cash outlay from a nonprofit is tough.

“I’m hoping when we do get to that point we’ll be able to say, ‘these are some things that are recommended and need to be covered, and here are the costs for doing it,'” Stover says.

I'm a news reporter for the Mercury. I've spent a lot of the last decade in journalism — covering tragedy and chicanery in the hills of southwest Missouri, politics in Washington, D.C., and other matters...

5 replies on “Can A Proposed Nonprofit Reverse Mayor Charlie Hales’ Reforms of Last Thursday?”

  1. “Any conditions they set, they’ll have to have a legal right to do so,” he tells the Mercury. “We have legal representation through the ACLU that is helping us make sure.”

    The city can legally regulate music volume and the closure of public streets.

  2. I don’t think enforcing laws which already exist really qualify as “reforms.” Collecting fees for an event that costs the city money and knowing the most basic information about the vendors making money on said event seems like a baseline for a street fare which is already permitted to run afoul of city regulations.

    The notion that there’s some city hall jackboot stomping the life out of an event that would be in no way substantively harmed by reasonable rule enforcement, which every other event in the city seems able to function under without issue, is an odd one, even for Portland.

  3. The police doing the job that they exist for at a public event should not be considered a cost of the event itself. It’s their job. That’s like charging the victim of a fire for the fire department to come to their house (except it’s a generally well behaved, enjoyable experience).
    Besides, it’s events like Last Thursday that have made Portland the growing, attractive place that it is. If anything, the city should be paying the organizers who are helping bring this prosperity to town, which happens to support other businesses and new residents that can now pay higher taxes, and employ local police, and the local government elect.

    The city’s rational is literally backwards. Last Thursday is going to happen whether city officials that have nothing to do with it want it to or not. Again, they should be paying the people willing to undertake organizing that kind of event.

  4. jesiah: If you light your house on fire on the same day at the same time every month for four months, you will absolutely be charged for the services rendered. You’ll also spend some time in jail.

Comments are closed.