Hi, we're useless chunks of cement! Credit: Alex Zielinski
Hi, were useless chunks of concrete!
Hi, we’re useless chunks of concrete! Alex Zielinski

As we enter the rainy season, hundreds of homeless Portlanders seek shelter in tents, cars, public warming shelters, a friend’s couch, or under building overhangs. Many also bundle up beneath bridges and overpasses to escape dreary downpours. That is, unless that space is already occupied by unused chunks of concrete.

If you happen to follow the MAX rails underneath the ramps that connect the Morrison Bridge to downtown Portland, you’ll find two neat rows of empty concrete planters. They don’t block the sidewalk, but line the side closest to the MAX rails. It’s a secluded, remarkably quiet spot for a sidewalk in the middle of downtown, and attracts little foot traffic. It’s no surprise that in the past, homeless Portlanders would lay out their sleeping bags under the overpass for a dry, unbothered night’s sleep. This winter, however, the concrete planters fill that space.

Please note the concrete planters take up EVERY INCH of dry pavement that doesnt block the sidewalk.
Please note the concrete planters take up EVERY INCH of dry pavement that doesn’t block the sidewalk. Alex Zielinski

You might recognize these planters from earlier this year, when we reported similar-looking objects crowding the sidewalk a block east, along Naito Parkway. The city had no idea who put them there, and the adjacent business (City Center Parking) did not return our calls.

It’s likely these planters were installed by the same people, since they are the exact same design and are adjacent to the same parking lot. They also seem to serve the exact same purpose: To keep people from sitting or sleeping outside, in a spot protected from the elements.

We were instantly suspicious about the Naito planters because they had been placed directly underneath an overpass, condemning the feeble shrubs planted in them to a life without sunlight. It insulted the intelligence of anyone who passed by them and considered, even just for a moment, if they were genuinely created to beautify the underside of a bridge ramp.

This newly-discovered set of concrete planters along the MAX rails, however, are somehow more insulting to humanity because they sit empty. Whoever installed them didn’t even attempt to pretend they serve a purpose other than to block people from shelter.

It’s still unclear if these planters were placed by nearby City Center Parking or the property owner, MMDC, a commercial real estate company. MMDC has been trying to get developers interested in the property—dubbed Morrison Bridgehead—since a long-simmering plan to turn the area into an indoor marketplace fell through in 2016. (MMDC has yet to respond to the Mercury‘s request for comment).

Alex Zielinski is a former News Editor for the Portland Mercury. She's here to tell stories about economic inequities, cops, civil rights, and weird city politics that you should probably be paying attention...

28 replies on “Hey Look, More Concrete Planters Designed to Displace Homeless Portlanders”

  1. If this is where people enter and exit the MAX, and tents and other debris were dangerously blocking the entrance/exit, thus forcing people into the tracks, then the concrete planters are a huge benefit even if they otherwise sit empty. Alex Zielinski clearly operates from the privilege of being an able-bodied person who can simply step around or over sidewalk obstructions, or hop over a tent while exiting the MAX – many of us and our family members are not so lucky.

  2. If you look at the picture again, “Flavio”, then you may notice that there is no MAX stop there. So, your argument falls flat on its privileged face.

  3. Why not spend all the money spent on these types of things (and the cost of labor that goes along with it) on actually helping homeless people?

  4. ’bout damn time. Live near a homeless camp and really see how things are. No one has a right to our public spaces. They are all of ours and I know everyone is tired of them covered in trash and smelling of piss, but for some reason people afraid of voicing that. There’s places for help if they need it. Our public spaces aren’t the option.

  5. Even if Flavio’s conjecture were accurate, his attitude conflating the notion of privilege with humanistic concern for those in peril, exposed to the elements, without resources, for WHATEVER reason they are so affected, belies his purported perspective of rationality; he is in fact a shit with flawed ideas.

  6. Alex Zielinski, I’d love to take you on a tour of criddlers’ lair at the crack of the dawn sometime.

    These things serve the purpose of creating an architectural barrier to undesirable activities like unauthorized bike chop shops and felony crime relating to conducts prohibited by state and federal law in addition to international treaty regarding psychotropic substances. Please review the theme behind many of stabbings that happened in the skid row recently.

  7. More of these planters please. This is a city full of green spaces. There is no reason they must cluster on the sidewalks and create another hepatitis outbreak like in San Diego. Residents who support this city have rights too.

  8. Omagawd, it must be agony for you people, trying to sleep in your warm bed while knowing there are all those dirty poors outside being soooo mean to you.

    When oh when will YOUR needs finally be addressed??

  9. It would be nice to see a front page story on the bad behavior SOME of the homeless engage in. You know, stuff like drug dealing, public drug use, used needles strewn about, piles of garbage, piles of stripped bike frames, gun caches, fires, fighting and urinating/defecating in public.

    Most all other media outlets in Portland publish livability stories with it comes to this meth epidemic/homeless issue, but not The Mercury. The Mercury only posts either positive stories on the homeless, exonerating their bad behavior and name-calling homeowners who have issues with said bad behavior, or weepy “poor wittle me” stories.

    Oh yes, they’ll call you a “NIMBY” if you do not fully accept these bad behaviors, but when asked if they’d like to house some of these homeless, they’ll call the suggestion ludicrous…without ever actually answering.

    This meth epidemic/homeless issue will never be solved when certain players like The Mercury, left-wing homeless advocate extremists ignore the reality of the situation.

    I, for one, welcome concrete planters on every street as an alternative to garbage piles, used drug needles, stripped bike frames, urine/poop and tents scattered everywhere.

  10. Alex, Invite them to sleep on your front porch. That would be more comfortable than this place. Or better, invite them in so they can sleep in a warm house.

  11. I walk through there almost everyday to work. I’m glad they’re displacing the homeless from there. It’s dangerous because there is so little foot traffic that it’s often me walking through a drug den full of homeless people.

  12. Gee, Euphonius, sounds like you’re the odd person out here. Maybe the ‘Merc can take #13 up on his/her/their offer for a tour of Criddle Country, maybe do a couple interviews, ask for proof of purchase on the dozens of bikes piled up, etc. No need to carry mace or a taser, these are all gentle souls just simply down on their luck a bit.

  13. Well, yeah they ARE concrete, but, as Everyone knows, concrete is Brittle.

    Careful you don’t Bump them, too hard!

    (NOT that I’d EVER recommend it)

  14. Whoever put them there, assuming it wasn’t the city, is doing the same as the campers; dumping their personal stuff in the public right of way to secure it for their private use. It is wrong in both cases.

  15. Oh look, something else for privileged white people to virtue signal over. Please, tell us why you believe these people aren’t capable of supporting themselves.

  16. @ 25 “Please, tell us why you believe these people

    aren’t capable of supporting themselves.”

    Sure, I’ll give it a stab, OJ:

    medical bankruptcies

    & lack of adequate (affordable) medical care

    employment cutbacks / outsourcing and the

    elimination of (family-wage paying) Union Jobs from America

    shit wages

    disappearing social safety net

    divorce

    massive student debt

    our current Every Man for Hisself ideology

    and sky high housing costs.

    Other than that, they just must be Losers

    and Deserve to fail.

    ‘Cause, Life’s Fair!

  17. Oops, sorry, OJ — almost forgot: Emergencies.

    Know how many famblies in this, the Richest Country

    on the Planet have LESS THAN $500 in Savings

    (according to Left-leaning Forbes magazine) ?

    I do: 63%.

  18. @26 Why did you leave out addiction and criminal history?

    Are you seriously saying that the group of white tweekers illegally camping near the North Vancouver overpass that I pass by every morning are there because of the things you listed?

    Odd that, say, massive student debt or a divorce would cause such a massive pile of garbage, a stack of stripped bike frames, open drug dealing and urinating into the slough (which I’m seen them do more than once) and creating environmental damage. Very odd, indeed..

  19. @28 — Yeah, right, Mr. Banter, all that shit takes place in a Vacuum.

    Nothing is EVER connected to anything else…

    Say, Mr. Banter — have you seen Chris Hedges’ and Joe Placo’s brilliant, eye-opening tome “Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt” ? From their review in the New York Times:

    “This book is a collaboration between Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco, showing us daily life in four centers of 21st-century American poverty. Hedges’ contribution — a combination of reportage and commentary — is in a long tradition of literary journalism. Sacco’s is the sort of graphic art popularized by Art Spiegelman in “Maus.” Both writers have decades of experience as correspondents in war zones, but in “Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt” they turn their attention to the bombed-out and collapsed areas of their own country.

    Sacco’s sections are uniformly brilliant. The tone is controlled, the writing smart, the narration neutral; we are allowed to draw our own conclusions. Hedges sees this book as a call to revolution, and as with most works in which the author’s philosophical and political beliefs are aired in an unfiltered manner, a lot of what you appreciate about Hedges’ writing will depend on how closely you identify with his politics.

    Anyone who grew up near a postindustrial area — who has seen a middle-class town become a pocket of destitution — will not find any one chapter in this book too shocking. What is shocking is the degree to which this depth of poverty is found everywhere, from rural Indian reservations to near-slave conditions in Florida tomato fields. These are not pleasant stories. They are the very sort of thing we all prefer to forget so that we can focus on our daily lives, and this makes it all the more important that they are recorded.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/books/review/days-of-destruction-days-of-revolt.html

    Check it out — it’s an Eye-Opener.

  20. @30 Thanks for not answering my questions. Pretty typical of left-wing extremists.

    Funny how right-wing and left-wing extremists have so much in common with one another…

  21. Still haven’t answered my original questions. I’m still on Point A, while you’ve zoomed all the way to Point J.

    I’m more of an A to B to C to D kind of person, while you seem like a very emotional and illogical person (extremist).

    Care to finally give my questions an answer? 😉

Comments are closed.