A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about Portland’s recent audit examining how—and how often—our city’s police officers use their Tasers. And while my story aired some of the questions that police-accountability advocates had about the report’s findings, the audit did, at least, include some calls for tightening controls on when cops can zap people with 50,000 volts of electricity.

But then I saw this story out of Chicago (the whole world’s watching!) this morning. There, because the city is giving the stun guns to patrol officers for the first time—Portland has been arming its officers since 2005—Taser use has skyrocketed. And that’s bad news for oversight:

A new report shows that Chicago police used Tasers to subdue nearly 700 offenders over 12 recent months, a dramatic increase that reflects the department’s decision earlier this year to expand its use of the weapons.

In a wide-ranging annual report issued Monday, the Independent Police Review Authority, which investigates serious accusations of police misconduct, said the increased use of the sometimes-controversial electrical devices has not generated many complaints, however.

As a result, the agency said it has decided against investigating every time an officer uses a Taser, saying the hundreds of incidents were “overwhelming” its resources. Instead, it will do so only if allegations of misconduct are made, serious injury or death resulted, or a minor or senior citizen was targeted.

Chicago cops used Tasers 683 times in the 12-month period ending September 30—up from 197 a year before and 163 before that, the report says. But since March, the number of Tasers in the hands of cops increased from 280 to 660.

In an explanation that should ring familiar around these parts, Chicago cops say the Tasers have helped defuse situations that otherwise might have turned deadly. But the central question with Taser use shouldn’t whether it avoids a shooting, but whether that same outcome could’ve been achieved without any weapon—lethal or not—being deployed at all. Otherwise the stun guns become a tool of compliance, not de-escalation.

Gawker, it seems, sums it up best: “So basically the only way for a police taser incident to be investigated in Chicago is if someone dies, or if children or old people are fried by a trigger happy cop. At this rate, pretty soon they’ll be tasering people for jaywalking.”

Denis C. Theriault is the Portland Mercury's News Editor. He writes stories about City Hall and the Portland Police Bureau, focusing on issues like homelessness, police oversight, insider politics, and...

5 replies on “Tasers Across the United States: Watch Your Asses in the Windy City”

  1. I’m sure that knowing that it is very unlikely that they will be subject to any scrutiny won’t have any impact on how often they use these torture devices…

    Also maybe people don’t complain because they know that the only thing that might come out of it is that the cops will harass them more.

  2. What about some real reporting here? When did Portland start using tasers, and what has been the change (if any) in the number of shootings in the years since that time?

  3. Very good point. I am seriously against tasers in almost every way; but if statistics proved that ~500 fewer people were shot by police in the same period the ~500 more electrocutions were delivered, then I might have to concede some of my opposition. In essence I don’t think that tasers are the real problem here. A systematically corrupt police system, with virtually no oversight, transparency, or accountability is the real problem. Tasers only serve to magnify the issue. Hopefully the senseless torture can spark some real change for the benefit of us all – like a complete revision & overhaul of our police systems.

  4. These men and women risk their lives to protect you every day, and if tasering a possible criminal has even a fraction of a chance to keep them alive and let them go home to their families, then by all means police officers protect yourself in a non-leathal way. If you don’t like tasers then maybe police officers should use rainbow guns that give out hugs and kisses. Get real!

  5. Ha! I’m definitely pro-police and pro-taser, but I think I’m closer to MacGyver’s POV than to ZMSA’s.

    I just wanted to say that I LOVE watching videos on YouTube of people getting tasered for not complying. After the officer tells you 10 times to get off your cell phone and step out of the car and you don’t…what’s he supposed to do? Wrestle with you? He might lose! It’s not supposed to be a fair fight, they are supposed to put you DOWN.

Comments are closed.