[Retweets are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent endorsements. You have a problem, take it to the tweeter.]
Mitt Romney had to thread a very fine needle during last night’s foreign policy debate. He had to hew closely to President Obama’s foreign policy while somehow seeming stronger than President Obama. He had to seem tough and ready to attack our enemies in order to keep his fellow Republicans interested, while still seeming like enough of a pacifist to calm Americans who don’t want to get involved in another endless war. And he had to somehow transform his own total lack of foreign policy experienceโhis entire ticket’s lack of foreign policy experience, in fact; this is the most inexperienced pair of Republican candidates at the top of a ticket in modern historyโinto an asset.

He failed on every single count.
Romney looked inexperienced, discombobulated, and even scared all night long. He reeled from point to point, trying to shoehorn twenty different topics into a single answer in the hopes of distracting his opponent. CNN reported that Mitt Romney was suffering from a cold or flu tonight. It showed. He was sweaty, he drifted from point to point, he grimaced in the background of shots. On substance, he looked ill-prepared and petulant. At times, he sounded like a pacifist. At other times, he presented himself as a George W. Bush-like warrior, skipping from conflict to conflict with the phony swagger that only money and a hearty sense of inflated self-importance can buy. Neither act was convincing.

This last debate was, in many ways, the reverse of the first debate. President Obama seemed calm, in command, and strong. Romney was absent. There were shades of the vice presidential debate, too: President Obama, like Biden in the second debate, resorted to outright mockery of his opponent’s lack of preparation. His sarcastic riff on Romney’s lack of understanding about the modern military (“we have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them”) was brutal, but it drove the point home very early in the debate: President Obama knows what he’s talking about when it comes to military matters. (Obama seems to be surprised by how much he enjoys being Commander-in-Chief, and he revels in how good he is at the job.) And he intellectually bested Romney again and again, often with touching, personal stories of the sort that Bill Clinton used to share all the time. If this was a road race, Obama lapped Romney multiple times. This was no contest. It was a massacre.

And best of all, Romney’s “safe” strategy reminded Republicans that this isn’t the champion of their precious, pure conservative thought. Romney will say anything to be president, and if that involves becoming an Obama clone to try to strip independent votes from the middle, he will happily do that. I suspect that some of that vaunted Republican enthusiasm for Romney will drain starting tonight, now that their candidate revealed himself so blatantly as a changeling. Republicans could now be entering a smaller-scale version of the tailspin that Democrats experienced after the first debate. With two weeks to go, that could make a huge difference on Election Day.

As to what this means for the larger presidential race: The sad truth is, the foreign policy presidential debate simply doesn’t matter as much as the first two debates. Don’t expect the polls to tip one way or the other in huge numbersโnot at this late date. But it’s a palpable win, an even clearer win than the second presidential debate. That’s not nothing. This is probably the best possible ending to the debate cycle that the Obama team could have hoped for. The rest is up to them, and all of us.

Obama Literally Murdered Facist Plutocrat Mitt Romney Last Night
by Paul Constant
Yeah, because Obama is soooooo honest:
http://factcheck.org/2012/10/false-claims-…
@PaulConstant:
“If this was a road race, Obama lapped Romney multiple times.”
This metaphor makes no sense. Road races tend to be Point A to Point B affairs, rather than multiple laps around one track. Way to mix a single subject metaphor…
Paul Constant fails on every single count
Wanna watch a debate that isn’t a contrived, controlled platform for the mega-banks and the military industrial complex? Tonight, watch the debate between Libertarian Gary Johnson, Jill Stein of the Green Party, Virgil Goode of the Constitution Party, and Rocky Anderson of the Justice Party. The debate starts at 6:00 pm PDT. http://freeandequal.org
Don’t throw your vote away, vote third party.
I’m confused by this article’s implication that Romney has been revealed to be, as it says, “a changeling”, and that his supporters will drop him now that they’ve found out.
Because, honestly, it’s been obvious for months. Romney has made an entire campaign out of saying whatever he thinks it is he’s supposed to say, regardless of whether it contradicts what he said the day before. The only time he’s being genuine are the times when he makes an ass of himself – and even some of those are probably just misjudged attempts at pretending to have a actual position. And despite this, he still has supporters. Millions of ’em, in fact.
The only thing that can explain this is identity politics. I mean, Obama is no peach; hell, I think he should be IMpeached. (I’m voting for Jill Stein.) But it’s not possible for millions of people who successfully learned how don pants to believe that Romney is actually a good choice for President on his merits – because he doesn’t have any. Millions of people voting for him because they want to see the other team lose, and inventing merits for him as a rationalization? Now THAT’S plausible.