The internet (read: Twitterverse) has been blowing up over the Obama campaign’s recent infographic following the life of imaginary US citizen, Julia. The interactive graphic follows Julia from the age of 3 to 67, comparing how the Obama administration will take better care of her throughout life than the Romney administration. At the least, it’s a clever way to hook the visually-turned-on web folks.
For example, “Under President Obama: During college, Julia undergoes surgery. It is thankfully covered by her insurance due to a provision in health care reform that lets her stay on her parents’ coverage until she turns 26.Under Mitt Romney: Health care reform would be repealed—Romney says he’d ‘kill it dead.'” The graphic goes on to tackle education, womens’ reproductive rights, small buisness needs and retirement.
This catchy graphic has had the Twitter world talking. The conversation—sparking both grumpy and hilarious responses—led to the creation of the #julia hashtag.
It’s not “nanny state”, it’s “daddy state”. Let Obama be your sugar daddy. All it takes is one vote.
Apparently the conservatives wants Julia to do it on her own without many help. Because its good to let Julia go into mounts of debts and fend for herself without unemployment or any women shelter. Or better yet, any domestic violence protection act.
Uh, which one was the “hilarious” one?
#3 – the one about the inflatable sex toy – duh.
oh shit, so 67 is the maximum age Obama Care will let us live?