Explain this one away, Ron Paul:
The eight-page mailer obtained by Reuters via Jamie Kirchick, who unearthed Paul’s newsletter archives in 2008, is mostly focused on a rambling conspiracy theory about changes to the dollar. But Paul tries to bolster his credibility on the issue by noting that his newsletters have also “laid bare the the coming race war in our big cities” as well as the “federal-homosexual coverup on AIDS,” adding that “my training as a physician helps me see through this one.” He also condemns the “demonic fraternity” Skull and Bones, a Yale secret society that “includes George Bush and leftist Senator John Kerry, Congress’s Mr. New Money,” and “the Israeli lobby that plays Congress like a cheap harmonica.”
I can’t wait to see how Paulites try to justify this 1993 mailer, which includes extensive “information” on how the then-new 100 dollar bill was introduced to track Americans using chemicals. The Paul campaign already denies that Paul wrote the mailer, which was written in the first person and signed by Ron Paul.
So, if Ron Paul were to get elected, what do you think he is most likely to do first?
a) End the war on drugs.
b) Create a system of concentration camps for black people funded by the confiscated assets of Planned Parenthood and anyone who has ever had, thought about having, or knows someone who has had an abortion.
c) Uphold the status quo like every other president in recent memory.
Yet, bloody Barrack will sign off on the National Defense Authorization Act, overwhelmingly approved by the House and Senate, legalizing the US military to arrest and detain US citizens without charge or trial.
But yeah, Ron Paul bad man.
@Totalitariland: a basic law of logic is that if A is false, then the statement “if A, then B” is true, regardless of whether or not B is true. Therefore, any statement that begins with the phrase “if Ron Paul were to get elected,” is true, because Paul hasn’t a chance in hell of getting elected. Therefore, if Ron Paul were to get elected, then he would do all three of those things first, whilst simultaneously bare-chest wrestling a grizzly bear in the Lincoln Bedroom.
Spindles, Obama is a fucking corporate and zionist shill who’s probably killed more Muslims than George W. Bush. – there’s NO disputing that. But Ron Paul is absolutely a lunatic and a complete fraud!
His racist news letters aside, Ron is also oppose to abortion, evolution, climate change, and probably Black people.
Yet, the Paultards all love him b/c he “wants to end the wars” and “legalize it”.
All of them really god damn suck, seriously the line of this presidential election is like line of “worse of” picks INCLUDING Obama. The biggest “anti-establishment” candidate is a white supremacist and anti-gay, and also probably nuts. While the establishment candidates want to grind you up into a fine paste.
Seriously, I would rather have COLOSSUS rule us complete tubes and blinking lights.
@4 The only time Ron Paul has ever voted for something that is not explicitly authorized in the Constitution, it was for America to recognize Martin Luther King day as a public holiday.
Paul is personally opposed to abortion, but would leave the mandate to individual states.
I seriously doubt Paul would endorse teaching creation theory in public school seeing as how he plans to cut the Department of Education; a corrupt, useless agency that has pretty much failed since it’s inception in 1980. Seems like the public school system worked reasonably well before 1980?
I don’t doubt Paul’s skepticism of man-made climate change when things like this happen:
http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/2010…
http://climategate.tv/2011/11/22/breaking-…
I only believe Ron Paul wants to end the wars because his 12-term congressional voting record has been absolutely and consistently anti-war.
Paul Constant, everybody! Don’t forget to tip your waitress.
I want neither Paul in the White House nor Obama being re-elected….however its very clear who the Mercury still endorses(obvious actually). I voted for him as well, lets just say the last 3 years have given me good reason not to do so again….but then again I don’t have my head up my ass and am not naive
If you haven’t noticed it, Paul Constant, you naive white libtard “progressive” propagandist, the race war is already going on, but “progressive” do-gooders like you are too naive to recognize it.
Or maybe you didn’t notice all the black-on-white violent flash mobs all this past year?
Maybe you missed the black mobs attacking HUNDREDS of whites at the Wisconsin State Fair? Or any one of the many many other anti-white black violent flash mobs?
Just how fucking naive or stupid are you, whitey?
violentflashmobs dot com
Get it through your thick fucking head Paul Constant: THERE IS NO LIBERAL IN THIS RACE!
All of the hope and changie bullshit you wished for, that you want so fucking bad, ISN’T GOING TO FUCKING HAPPEN.
Yeah, your choice is between a war monger and a racist: welcome to 21st Century American Democracy, you blind fuck. It’s been this way for years. Buy a rifle, overthrow the government, or stop complaining that you have to pick between two assholes.
Can anyone come up with more evidence than one newsletter some time years ago?
I’ve heard racists talk, and you won’t catch them saying racists things once, you know, they repeat them over and over, and over, and over again.
Can we get some more substantial evidence?
Libertarianism is a very misunderstood ideology. Libertarianism, while it will not favor government overwhelming intervention to stop racism (say in the private sector), believes that individualism, regardless of race, is the most important aspect of society (i.e., a true libertarian cannot be racist as that is not important).
I am not a major Paul supporter, and I even voted for Obama, but you’d be hard pressed to find a better candidate in the field today.
Paul is real change, at least, and I might be crazy enough to vote for him.
I’m tired of the status quo in DC. You should too. We can’t keep waiting 4 more years, we’ve been kicking the can down the road.
I don’t blame rabid Paul supporters for being outraged about his this is being treated in the media. I believe this has turned into an outrageous charade (kind of like the whole Obama pastor fiasco a few years ago).
Let’s be objective here. Is Paul really racist? Someone as old as him is going to step in some mud more than once if he truly held those view.
It looks like Ron Paul’s old newsletters might turn out to be right after all!
Blacks riot at Mall of America
http://tinyurl.com/chl5we3
“Air Jordan Riots” all across the country, the vast majority of rioters are blacks:
http://tinyurl.com/bv8adla
Oh, and Enoch Powell was right too!
Blacks kill and stab other blacks in London over stolen shoes at Foot Locker (not to mention the largely black riots in London earlier this year)
http://tinyurl.com/6pbz2rf
Don’t forget the 50+ violent black “flash mobs” in the USA this past year! Many of them with a serious anti-white component!
http://tinyurl.com/4yb9dpz
Wake up from you naivete and pathetic white guilt.
I may not know much but there is one thing I do know for sure. Ron Paul is not a racist. This is nothing but pure junk. It makes me sick when the MSM launches an attack such as this. I mean the man is in his seventies and this is all they could dig up. The Republican and Democratic parties have completely tanked this country and now with the help of some on here they want to finish it off. After we hit the debt wall in July 2012 people will be begging for Ron Paul because he is the ONLY CANDIDATE who has a plan to cut our deficit and spending. The others are status quo.
Ron Paul is not a racist. Any one with just half a brain knows this. Give it up.
Ron Paul 2012
Ron Paul, in addition to being a racist, a crackpot, and a homophobe, likes to yell at clouds.