We’re gearing up for our Mayoral Inquisition this Tuesday night at Rontoms and have an important question: What words or phrases should we ban from the conversation?

The point of the Inquisition is to get mayoral candidates Jefferson Smith and Charlie Hales out of campaign-pat-answers-soundbite mode and into having an actual conversation. In that interest, we want to ban some things from being uttered. For example: Portlandia jokes. Portlandia jokes will be banned. Long-winded metahpors, especially ones referencing Where the Red Fern Grows, will be banned. What other things should we nix in the sake of quality conversation?

grabbag-570.jpeg

Sarah Shay Mirk reported on transportation, sex and gender issues, and politics at the Mercury from 2008-2013. They have gone on to make many things, including countless comics and several books.

14 replies on “What Phrases Should We Ban at the Mayoral Inquisition?”

  1. STEVE R ALREADY POACHED MOST OF THE GOOD ONES.

    “AT THE TABLE”
    “STAKEHOLDERS”

    THAT STUPID JOKE THAT SMITH SAYS ABOUT “BEING ONLY PARTIALLY FULL OF SHIT”. I’M NOT SURE WHAT VERBAL TICS HALES HAS, BUT BAN THEM WHATEVER THEY ARE.

    EVERY TIME A CANDIDATE SAYS ONE OF THE BAD WORDS, SHOCK THEM IN THE GENITALS WITH AN ELECTRIC PROD.

  2. “jobs for the middle class” without any reference to the poor (the former implying “lower class”); Portland Timbers and RCTID; +1 on “at the table” and “stakeholders”; also, “moving forward” (“forward” by itself is OK)

  3. Make it really interesting and ban the phrase “these tough economic times.” I want someone to have to describe what’s going on using their brain muscle.

    I second the extremely well thought out idea of using electric shock to underscore the seriousness of the ban.

  4. “Back to basics” or anything about “filling potholes first”! (Charlie, I’m looking at you.)

    On the other side of the coin I’d be happy to hear mention of the word “VISION”, something that has been sorely lacking in this lackluster race.

  5. “right size”
    “benevolently irrational”

    Any juxtapositional statement about the CRC that frames the other candidate’s position on the project.

Comments are closed.