In case you thought backtacular ass-crack patches and vajazzlers were a product of our crap-hoarding modern society, let it be known that they merely carry on a long legacy that marches through history:

129169813701386551.jpg

I hope I’m just not seeing the decimal points there. I mean it IS pretty scandalously sexy but $2000 is a little rich, especially for the 1970s. And here’s what I’ve never gotten about these types of things: If the presumable aim is to essentially trick someone into potentially getting it on with you, what are you supposed to do if it works and they discover this under your blouse? What could you possibly say??? If I were a man or lesbian and found I’d been tricked by the old “no-bra” look that actually is a bra but even worse I would feel totally justified in ending things right there because I did not sign up for sub-perky actually bra-less nipples. How that is worth $2000 to the wearer is beyond me.

Marjorie Skinner is the Portland Mercury's Managing Editor, author of the weekly Sold Out column chronicling the area's independent fashion and retail industry, and a frequent contributor to the film and...

6 replies on “Now You Can Have That Sensual “No-Bra” Look While Wearing A Bra…”

  1. These still exist. I met someone last month who was wearing one. She was very, very happy with it. She got it at a trade show.

Comments are closed.