To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Amy and I have just been doing the math on this.
We reckon $1800 over three hours, divided by 10, is $180 for the homeless. Tops. And is that better publicity than shutting your restrooms so they’re for the use of customers only?
“And is that better publicity than shutting your restrooms so they’re for the use of customers only?”
Context might help you not look like a crotchety wing-nut, Matt. For example, letting the general readership know what the shutting of restrooms has to do with Burgerville donating money to charity. Or some rationale for how business’s charitable donations should be viewed through the lens of publicity.
You seem to be complaining about Burgerville directing a portion of its proceeds to helping the homeless, but upon close examination of the text, you don’t seem to actually try and put forth an argument.
Bang up job, per usual…
Thanks.
No, no, YOU suck. YOU do.
WAT??????
No seriously, WAT?????
Is this the part where you start threatening legal actions against those that dare suggest your writing isn’t always up to snuff? Pure comedy gold, mate. Keep it up.