funny-ad-baby-ronald-mcdonald.jpg

Excerpt of a love letter from the Center for Science in the Public Interest to Ronald and his pals at McDonalds:

By advertising that Happy Meals include toys, McDonaldโ€™s unfairly and deceptively markets directly to children. When McDonaldโ€™s bombards children with advertisements or other marketing for Happy Meals with toys, many children will pester their parents to take them to McDonaldโ€™s. Once there, they are more than likely to receive a meal that is too high in calories, saturated fat, added sugars, and sodium, and devoid of whole grains. Developing a lifelong habit of eating unhealthy meals is likely to promote obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and other life-threatening or debilitating diet-related diseasesโ€ฆ

โ€ฆTherefore, unless we can resolve this matter in the near term, CSPI will bring a lawsuit that seeks an injunction preventing McDonaldโ€™s from providing toys with purchases of any or all Happy Meals.

The steamy reply from McDonaldโ€™s CEO Jim Skinner:

At McDonald’s, we listen to what our customers tell us. For the past 30 years they have told us โ€” again, overwhelmingly โ€” that they approve of our Happy Meal program. Three decades provide a lot of listening time. That’s why we are confident that parents understand and appreciate that Happy Meals are a fun treat, with right-sized, quality food choices for their children.

Just get a room already!

Iโ€™m calling bullshit on this whole ridiculous mess. First of all, McDonalds, I donโ€™t care what you say. Your food has not been, and will never be a healthy choice for children (or anyone that matter). Your food is a cheap thrill, a guilty pleasure, and is beneficial only in that it provides inexpensive, fatty, sugar-laden calories to quell a hangover, or to promote self-hatred. But even there, Taco Bell has you beat.

As for you, CSPI, itโ€™s your brand of no-fun rhetoric that really pisses me off. Youโ€™re making food feel like a fucking dangerous animal. Itโ€™s not. I understand that you want to help children and curb childhood obesity, but understand that we donโ€™t need to get litigious about this. The idea should be to educate parents; to help them make healthy choices for their children. Taking away toys just makes you look like some kind of asshole.

And parents? If your whiny kids are getting the better of you by throwing tantrums about Happy Meals then you need some help. Isnโ€™t it your job, as an adult, to help your kids make the right choices? Thisโ€™ll probably come back to haunt me should the wife and I reproduce, BUT: Buck up, grow a pair, and say โ€œNoโ€ to your bratโ€ฆ repeatedly.

Ahhh. I feel so much better now.Time for another Quarter Pounder.

17 replies on “Mmmmm. Litigation.”

  1. Interesting story. I think the OP needs to have more experience with children before leaping out against the litigation – a McDonalds addicted child is far stronger in willpower than most adults. I bet he’d be running for the arches before the day was out.

  2. “Buck up, grow a pair, and say โ€œNoโ€ to your bratโ€ฆ repeatedly.”

    Oh, god, how I wish I could scream that at some people at restaurants/movie theaters/airplanes/stores/doctors’ offices/etc. without fearing for my life. THANK. YOU.

  3. I’d be more worried about the amount of lead and heavy metals in the toy than the saturated fat in the food. And who cares if we’re spawning an entire generation of fat children, at least I’ll still be able to keep making fun of the morbidly obese.

  4. Patrick can you travel back in time and have this conversation with my mother? I’ll bet middle school would have been tolerable had I been able to run a mile without wheezing.

  5. @kiala

    Sure! Just let me get this Flux Capacitor going. But be warned: after this is done your life may be changed irrevocably. I’m not to blame if you find yourself drinking vitamin water and eating small vegetable plates on your La Jolla, CA, balcony and bitching about your sixth ex-husband.

  6. Good for CSPI. I look forward to a test for the legal argument: “you tricked us into liking something that obviously isn’t good for us, to the point where we lost all moral agency.”

    @ SPK, you misspelled “ate” in your second sentence.

  7. Kids can be really annoying. But I will say that raising kids looks deceptively easy from the outside. I have a few single friends who are convinced they’ve got child rearing all figured out. (ha ha)

    But it is possible (and good for them) to tell kids no when you need to.

  8. Totally disagree with the Taco Bell bit at the end. I’ve never understood what drives people to this place. Doesn’t matter how late it is, how long it’s been since I’ve eaten or how stoned I may be, the menu at Taco Bell has never held any appeal for me. Gimme a whiffy pie, a New York Dog from Zach’s or a bowl of jambalaya at Montage over Taco Bell, any day of the week… And I don’t even live in SE!

Comments are closed.