To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
confidential to Dan: please abandon “confidential to.”
It’s actually a guest editorial, so don’t go all Richard Dawkins on their asses.
The writer’s an ass-hat, though. That’s like blaming lynching victims for evoking the ire of the KKK in the 20’s.
Horrible.
Proof that at least 90% of Xtians are clueless assholes – and I’m being charitble.
Public to Commenty Colin: Please abandon “confidential to.”
I don’t understand this post. It’s an op-ed by the guy who runs the Family Research Council, a well-known cabal of bigots.
What referendum is this on all Christians?
I mean, here in Portland our Oregonian regularly runs climate change-denying op-eds by some asshat named Gordon Fuchs, who has a PhD. Does that make all scientists climate change-denying asshats?
I certainly don’t think so, but Dan Savage might disagree.
I love how this guy implies that there’s a choice when he writes…
“Some homosexuals may recognize intuitively that their same-sex attractions are abnormal–yet they have been told by the homosexual movement, and their allies in the media and the educational establishment, that they are “born gay” and can never change. “
But how quickly would he fight against other “choices”, such as say…abortion? I guess homosexuals CAN have a choice in their destiny, but women CANNOT. I wish I had the luxury of that kind of rule changing. People who mess with others heads like this should stick to faith based arguments-they always lose in the realm of logic.