To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
D is always suspiciously absent from the comments of these types of stories. I wonder if that trend will continue?
Much as I agree with the conclusions, I’ve got to question how they end up with us being as low as 21st in the country for quality of life.
@Stu, if you look at the chart, the footnote indicates they are comparing quality of life using an “index of schools, health, crime, cost of living and poverty rates” Which, when you consider the large number of people living in poverty and class room size, etc… somewhere better than half the sates seems about right.
Cue Dave Lister and Jack Roberts trying to spin this to the detriment of those damn anti-business Democrats!
Has Chris Dudley seen this. It destroys his only talking point.
Um, one problem. The reasons why it’s so great, looking at the chart is because of “labor supply” (ie, lots of over-qualified, unemployed people desperate for a job), “growth prospects” (ie, you’re doing shitty enough now that things can only get better), and quality of life (ie, Oregon’s got a great personality).
Don’t know that it’s that big of a problem, extramsg. Our business cost ranking is 18th, which is the main argument the so-called “pro-business” types always make when trying to cut taxes. Looking at all of the categories, Oregon’s lowest ranking is in regulatory environment (34th). There are plenty of reasons for businesses to locate here, as they seem to be doing.
Given that Oregon’s unemployment rate is in the bottom 10-20% of states, I’d say it’s a problem.