GREEN LANTERN Pictured: Van Wilder, CG Mohawked Fish-Chicken Space Cop.

GREEN LANTERN is pretty goddamned dumb.

We probably should’ve seen this coming: Green Lantern has looked pretty goddamned dumb in every trailer and TV ad. That was no misrepresentation; no confused, bumbling media machine improperly selling their sci-fi epic. Green Lantern is exactly the giant-size lump of glowing green stupid it’s always appeared to be.

Being dumb isn’t necessarily a condemnation when it comes to the story of Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds), a hotshot test pilot so courageous that a dying purple alien gifts him with a Green Lantern power ringโ€”a sparkly piece of jewelry that allows him to tap into the green light of pure will, one of the strongest energy sources in the universe. With that power, he can manifest solid objects via the power of his imagination, and fight those who’ve been made evil by the yellow light of fear.

That’s dumb, but that’s the storyโ€”and variations on it have worked over the course of Green Lantern’s 70-plus-year comics history. Maybe not frequently, but people have taken that engine and used it to fuel some fun storytelling. That’s not what happens here.

When it’s letting itself be a goofy sci-fi movie filled with outlandish things like CG Mohawked Fish-Chicken Space Cops Voiced by Geoffrey Rush (and that’s just one of the many goofy aliens Jordan meets as he’s inducted into the Green Lanterns’ space cop fraternity), Green Lantern‘s fine enough. But most of the movie’s just a lazy homage to Top Gun with some decent sci-fi action haphazardly slapped on. The whole thing feels weirdly assembled, like director Martin Campbell (GoldenEye, Casino Royale) was handed a particularly bewildering checklist:

Step 1: Expel mountains of comic book exposition.

Step 2: Decline to augment said exposition with anything resembling “visual storytelling.”

Step 3: Do exactly the opposite of what the exposition just dictated.

Step 4: Insert big dumb action sequence, now made inert by its total uselessness.

Step 5: MAKE IT LOUDER.

To be fair, Reynolds gives a good performance in a subpar movie, but also to be fair, that could describe any film on his IMDb page. Peter Sarsgaard puts in the work to make a great villain, but like Reynolds, he’s lost in a movie that doesn’t deserve him. Love interest Blake Lively does two things of note: Look like young Jane Seymour, and provide Hal his motivation. “If you didn’t quit something you were good at for once in your life, what’s the worst that could happen?” are more or less her words of encouragement. That’s a call-to-arms if I’ve ever heard one.

Actually, even if the TV ads and previews hadn’t tipped us off, a scene near the beginning of the film works pretty well as a harbinger/metaphor for Green Lantern as a whole: Hal Jordan is trying to wrap his nephew’s birthday present with a wad of newspaper and absurdly long strips of scotch tapeโ€”all while doing 90 MPH in a residential area. Such is the film: a pretty thing, covered up by a jumble of throwaway words, hastily taped together, just barely avoiding a catastrophic crash.

Green Lantern

dir. Martin Campbell
Opens Fri June 17
Various Theaters
(Scroll down for showtimes)

Bobby Roberts is one of the Portland Mercury's calendar editors, as well as one of its film and pop-culture critics. His past career choices included joining corporate broadcast radio just in time for...

5 replies on “Dorkiest Knight”

  1. Depressing to hear Bobby, but entirely what I expected. WAAAAY too much money was throw at the marketing of this thing. That alone can never really be a good sign. It’s like a guy trying to wear a girl down enough to become his girlfriend by every day, showing up in the same place (our TVs) for a couple minutes at a time, simply saying “Come on…. I promise you’ll have only the best time with me.”

  2. I’m 87% sure I’ll see it, but will probably do so at a cheap theater where beer can be had. I think that I’ll need a beer or three to enjoy this.

    What’s frustrating is that silly comic book characters can be done well. Thor is a stupidly bombastic space viking who fights aliens and speaks as if he were a Shakespeare character. Yet, the movie totally embraced the sparkly bombast and really kind of worked. It wasn’t dark, or gritty or “realistic” at all. It was big, splashy and delightful.

    The Green Lanterns are nearly as ridiculous. They’re magical space cops who all dress alike and use jewelry to punch evil in the face with giant fists. Yet, that shouldn’t be an impediment to making a perfectly neato kickass movie. I hope that viewers who see it and don’t like have presence of mind enough to blame the style and execution, not the source material or source medium.

  3. Completely neglected to mention in the review: The 3D isn’t bad. It’s not GREAT (all the good usage of it is right up front in the opening credits, and then it’s pretty subdued throughout) but it’s not bad.

Comments are closed.