SOME REMAKES stand on their own, reinventing, expanding, and
occasionally surpassing their source material. Fame is not one
of those remakes. This unasked-for adaptation is so forgettable and
insubstantial that it’s really only worth discussing in the context of
the original.
People make fun of the 1980 musical Fame without having seen
it, and unjustly so: For a movie about a bunch of fruity drama kids,
it’s gritty, honest, and unexpectedly badass. Set in New York City’s
Performing Arts High School, the original Fame tackles a whole
slew of issues, from abortion, religion, and homosexuality to the
disappointments and dangers that accompany a desire to be famous. And
there’s dancing!
The tween friendly remake borrows Fame‘s structure, following
a handful of students over four years of school, but it dumbs down its
characters’ lives, offering up a bunch of clean-cut wannabe stars with
PG-rated problems. It’s blandly entertaining, to be sureโwatching
hot teenagers dance has an appeal whose universality can’t (nay,
shouldn’t) be denied. But there’s none of the original’s energy,
none of the relevance, none of the boundary pushing. Instead of a
grey-haired music teacher shouting “It’s not your dick you’re holding,
it’s a violin bow!”, or a gay kid coming out to his entire school, the
biggest conflict here arises when a girl gets dumped by her
feather-haired boyfriend.
Despite the meticulously multiracial cast, there’s something vanilla
about the remake: The sex is gone, the language is cleaned up, and the
music is downright cheesy, substituting a generic hiphop score for the
pop giddiness of the original. None of the characters are clearly
defined: There’s a sorta Jew-y filmmaker, a sorta WASP-y ballerina, a
sorta angry rapper. Perhaps most disappointingly, there are no openly
gay characters. At a performing arts school! And remember that scene in
the original where Ralph and Doris go see The Rocky Horror Picture
Show? The closest the new film comes to acknowledging the
counterculture is name-checking Wes Anderson.
The 1980 film is about finding oneself, finding one’s voice,
figuring out where one fits into the world. The 2009 remake is about
being oneself, as if it’s enough to pick up a microphone and
spew one’s insides all over the stage. It isn’t. Conflict and
introspection are necessary, in life and in film. It’s too bad the
(re)makers of Fame didn’t realize that.

possibly the best local film review (or any, for that matter) i’ve read in memory. the original Fame is a forgotten classic; thanks for reminding those of us old enough to have seen it how good it was, and why.