DOWNTOWN POLICE Officer Chadd Stensgaard was fined $35 last week for parking his patrol car illegally outside a Japanese restaurant back in March, and the city’s first response to the embarrassment has been to work on rewriting the law so it doesn’t happen again.

Last Wednesday, July 23, Stensgaard was found guilty by Multnomah County Traffic Court Judge Terry Hannon of parking his patrol car illegally outside the SanSai Japanese Grill on NW 21st, while on duty March 7 [“Turning the Tables,” News, April 17].

Eric Bryant, a private citizen who happens to have recently became a lawyer, brought the case against Stensgaard in a traffic court packed with TV cameras, photo and print journalists, and of course, cops.

Assistant Police Chief Lynnae Berg, Central Precinct Commander Mike Reese, Public Information Officer Sergeant Brian Schmautz, and a dozen regular patrol officers crammed into the back of the courtroom, in uniform, to see justice done.

Reese testified that he felt Stensgaard had done the reasonable thing by stopping to get some dinner in a no-parking zone.

“We are expected to respond to emergency calls,” he said, and need to be near the vehicle.

Lawyers for Stensgaardโ€”paid for by the police unionโ€”argued he was justified in parking outside the restaurant because his patrol car contained guns and expensive equipment that could be dangerous if it fell into the wrong hands. But Judge Hannon ruled that while he felt the officer had acted reasonably, the parking laws apply to everyoneโ€”including cops.

Bryant’s attorney asked Stensgaard why he couldn’t have gone to a McDonald’s or a Starbucks nearby, somewhere where he could have parked legally.

“I don’t eat fast food,” Stensgaard responded. “And I don’t drink coffee.”

After the judge ruled, Bryant spoke to the Mercury. “I’m just pleased that the judge held that parking laws apply to police officers as well as to ordinary citizens,” he said.

Since then, the city attorney’s office has reportedly been working on overhauling the law, so that officers can legally park in certain no-parking zones. (City Attorney David Woboril did not return the Mercury‘s call for comment by press time.)

Though Woboril told the Tribune that Portland Department of Transportation (PDOT) would survey no-parking zones, a PDOT spokesperson says PDOT isn’t working on the issue. “Maybe the police department is,” says PDOT’s Maureen Yandle.

The city does not plan to appeal Stensgaard’s fine.

Matt Davis was news editor of the Mercury from 2009 to May 2010.

4 replies on “Above and Below the Law”

  1. If a vigilante lawyer were to pursue a gendarme who drove his cruiser through a yellow light (a $242 hit), would the city attorney’s office seek to change the law handed down by the OR legislature? Yes, it’s true: in OR, a yellow is the same as a red, whether a driver or ODOT knows it. (It is not mentioned in ODOT’s Driver’s Manual.) That is, in OR, there is no longer a functional difference between a yellow and a red light. How can the League of Vigilante Lawyers (CVL) be contacted?

  2. Sir:

    There is a very real danger to the police in making an exception for them in this or any ordinance or law.

    If the reality of the ordinance is changed to allow the police to “break” a law all others must obey, it gives the unfortunate perception that our police are above the law or at least feel they are above the law.

    This is turn, could cause citizens to feel they can ignore ordinances they find inconvenient. The bottom line is that by making it easier to take a break, the police may be adding to the difficulty and dangerousness of their jobs.

    It is important that in reality and in appearance our police force is beyond reproach. If they are not, it encourages others to ignore laws they find inconvenient.

    This is why the principle in the US Constitution that no man is above the law is so vitally important. In this case, it helps protect the police. Their job is difficult enough as it is. Why do they want to make it potentially harder on themselves?

    I remain your humble servant,

    Jacomus

Comments are closed.