LAST SEPTEMBER, Phoebe Gresser was walking through Sellwood when she realized a car was creeping behind her.

Her route, along SE Tacoma, cut through a relatively busy part of the neighborhood, but it was 1:30 am, and Gresser was 20 years old and alone. It felt like a wasteland.

She tried to shake the car, turning around and walking the other way. When the sedan also turned, Gresser began to run.

The unmarked car sped past and pulled into a parking lot, cutting her off. Two men hopped out and hurried toward her. Against every instinct, Gresser says she froze, incapacitated by fear.

“I thought my luck had run out,” she said recently. “I know that sounds dramatic.”

The first thing her assailants said to her: “OLCC.”

“The next thing one of them says, which is not okay, is ‘Aren’t you glad it’s just us and not someone else?'”

After they’d frightened the Lewis and Clark College junior into thinking she’d be raped or kidnapped, the two Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) investigators accused Gresser of being drunk and wrote her a ticket for being a minor in possession of alcohol. They also warned her she was in violation of the law simply for running from them.

“If it [had been] a cop and they would have turned their lights on,” she says, “I would have stopped.”

Gresser says the OLCC crossed the line that night, and college officials and state lawmakers who’ve heard her story agree. Meanwhile, Lewis and Clark students say the incident is representative of the agency’s heavy-handed tactics. They’re railing against the enforcement at a time the OLCC is asking for sweeping new power over Oregon marijuana laws.

It seems to be working.

“If I were the liquor control commission chair and there were two clowns running around in an unmarked car hauling down on lone females near a college campus, those guys would be counting paper clips while we had an investigation on their fitness to do the job,” says State Senator Ted Ferrioli (R-John Day), the senate’s top Republican and vice chair of a joint committee tasked with crafting Oregon’s pot laws. “You do not do a Starsky and Hutch in the middle of a darkened street.”

Ferrioli and his colleagues on the weed committee heard Gresser’s story from Representative Ann Lininger (D-Lake Oswego), and the timing couldn’t have been more perfect. Lininger received a visit from Gresser, who’s a member of Lewis and Clark’s student government, on April 1, the same day lawmakers were considering an OLCC request for broad authority to enforce the state’s new recreational marijuana laws, just as it does alcohol.

“The stories they relayed were actually very troubling,” Lininger said at the meeting. “Based on the conversation I had earlier today I’m not looking to replicate what my constituents’ experience is for alcohol.”

Jesse Sweet, an OLCC staffer testifying before the committee said the agency is “working at improving our relationships with constituents,” but declined to comment on the story.

Lawmakers piled on, voicing support for granting the OLCC limited authority to enforce laws on “licensed premises,” but not for wider-ranging patrols.

“What we don’t want is them to be knocking on someone’s door and saying, ‘We wanna see your home grow,'” said Senator Floyd Prozanski (D-Eugene).

The effect Lewis and Clark students will have on the agency’s liquor enforcement is less certain.

The OLCC downplays its enforcement efforts when it comes to college campuses. In a recent memo asking for expanded power, the agency acknowledged it has a “broad grant of authority” to enforce liquor laws. “In practice,” the agency wrote, “the liquor inspectors focus their enforcement efforts on licensed premises.” That’s not the case near many Oregon colleges and universities, where the agency’s officers issue tickets at house parties and patrol streets for minors to stop.

Asked about those tactics, OLCC spokesperson Christie Scott said the agency has developed partnerships with colleges all over the state, and that campuses value the help. She forwarded a 2013 letter from the head of Lewis and Clark’s campus safety department, commending the agency’s efforts.

“It is unfortunate that this student had the experience that you describe,” Scott said, suggesting Gresser file a complaint with the agency. “OLCC staff have a great relationship with Lewis and Clark Campus Safety and try very hard to work cooperatively with students.”

Gresser also forwarded a document: The results of an online survey conducted by Lewis and Clark’s student government, which asked students about interactions with OLCC officers. The responses, which were anonymous, came back universally negative.

“I was grabbed by the chin by an officer and addressed as ‘hun,'” said one characteristic response. “I felt uncomfortable with the situation and I felt patronized.”

“As an RA [resident assistant], I can state that I feel their presence has had a detrimental effect on my ability to live and work in this community,” said another. “Their policing creates an atmosphere of distrust and fueled acrimonious feeling toward authority figures.”

It’s not just students voicing concern. The college’s lawyer says Lewis and Clark firmly believes the OLCC should be able to crack down on underage drinking, but he was concerned by Gresser’s story.

“If that kind of stuff is happening it’s a big abridgment of rights,” says General Counsel David Ellis. “If my daughter was being followed by a car walking down the street at night, I’d tell her to get the hell out of there.”

For her part, Gresser admits to drinking on the night of her encounter with the OLCC, but says it was only a couple of beers. Investigators, meanwhile, wrote in an incident report she was slurring and pugnacious, smelling heavily of alcohol, which she denies.

Whatever the case, Gresser says she agrees with the OLCC’s ability to write her a ticket as a minor who’d broken the law. She and her student government colleagues just think it needs to abide by more guidelines when doing so.

“The end game is to change the law,” says Nick LeSage, a Lewis and Clark sophomore and student government member. “We want statutory language that they must issue a field sobriety test, and they must be wearing uniforms and be driving marked cars.”

They’ve asked Lininger to look into crafting a bill that requires as much. The lawmaker’s interested, and has scheduled a meeting with the OLCC to address the students’ concerns.

“I take it seriously,” Lininger says. “Nobody wants young people getting scared and intimidated by authority.”

I'm a news reporter for the Mercury. I've spent a lot of the last decade in journalism — covering tragedy and chicanery in the hills of southwest Missouri, politics in Washington, D.C., and other matters...

10 replies on “Drunk on Power?”

  1. The biggest problem I have with these kind of targeted enforcement actions against people walking at night is that it discourages safe decisions. If people feel like they are being targeted while walking it may encourage them to drive instead.

  2. Fantastic. I feel like, somewhere in Portland this very moment, an aspiring rapist has a lightning bolt of inspiration. “Stop! OLCC.”

  3. “Gresser says she agrees with the OLCC’s ability to write her a ticket as a minor who’d broken the law”. I find it sad that she has been taught to bow down to “law enforcement” like this. These OLCC “officers” should not be able to issue a ticket outside of a licensed establishment. They were obviously prowling for revenue.
    Also, what does this have to do with Lewis & Clark? Tacoma st. is a decent distance from campus and there is no way they could have known that she was a student. This is a huge over-reach.

  4. I run a licensed establishment and one of our servers got caught serving a beer to a 20 year old OLCC agent in a sting operation a few months ago. I went down to the OLCC office to discuss the issue with the agents one afternoon. At no point did the discussion focus in any way on public safety, not contributing to the delinquency of minors, etc. He just stated over and over again how I need to train my staff so we don’t get caught again in another sting operation. These guys have been running a serious racket on every bar and restaurant in the state; I’m really unhappy to see that it’s not spreading to enforcement actions on individual citizens.

  5. Who could I contact if I have a story concerning overly aggressive, unprofessional contact by OLCC? My residence is about a mile or so from main campus and has multiple LC students living here and I am a recent alum.

  6. I fail to see what legal authority these pukes had to write her a ticket especially when they dont have the legal authority to harrrass people at night who are walking down the street not bothering anyone.They are not licensed cops with a badge.They singled her out cause she was an easy target to pick on cause they are too lazy to pick on who they should be picking on.

  7. I assume what they are doing qualifies as a citizen arrest? I would have refused to show ID. This is beyond ridiculous! When I was college, actual police officers issued MIP’s.

  8. Is there any branch or bureau of local city, county, or state government around here that isn’t either completely corrupt or completely inept? It’s starting to get pretty old.

  9. To the person who said there is no way that they could of known she was a student, and that the connection to Lewis & Clark is a huge reach, I assure you that is not true. The OLCC without a doubt particularly profiles the campus and students. Sellwood is only a short drive over the bridge from Lewis & Clark is known for being a student populated area. Their tactics usually include finding student house parties and either following party goers home or waiting a short distance from the location and stopping people. I doubt that they went after her randomly. I bet that they followed her home from whatever house she was drinking at. I’m speculating here but like most colleges there are always a few houses that are known for throwing parties. Based on the stories I’ve heard the OLCC figures out which houses these are and particularly likes to harass them by keeping an eye on them on the weekends. In short. I would not be surprised at all if those agents were completely aware that she was a Lewis & Clark student and followed her home from a house that they knew was a student leased residence with the explicit intention of giving her an MIP.

Comments are closed.