TO PEOPLE who’ve attended most of the forums held so far in Portland’s still-young mayoral contest, it may well seem like a two-man ballot.

State Treasurer Ted Wheeler and Multnomah County Commissioner Jules Bailey are the most prominent and seasoned candidates in the race, and so they’re getting invited to share their thoughts with union members, bar goers, and arts enthusiasts.

There’s logic in this approach. Bailey and (in particular) Wheeler are raising the cash that history tells us is necessary to gain office in Portland. They have carefully cultivated academic pedigrees, and actual experience as elected officials. To the extent that event organizers feel their time is best spent questioning candidates with a shot at gaining office, Wheeler and Bailey are the obvious choices.

But if you attended the mayoral forum on homelessness last Friday at Union Gospel Mission, you watched that rationale quickly disintegrate.

For the first time, the forum presented an opportunity to see the mayoral race’s most vocal candidates side by side, answering questions about what has emerged in recent months as one of the city’s central issues. Wheeler and Bailey were present, of course, but so were Sean Davis, Sarah Iannarone, David Schor, and Jessie Sponberg—hopefuls who’ve clamored for a little light while sitting in the shadow cast by the “top two” candidates.

The forum was far better for their inclusion. What might have been a recitation of the largely comparable positions on homelessness Wheeler and Bailey have been offering for months—summary: it’s terrible, housing and shelter are desperately needed, and organized camping is a slippery slope—was instead a punchy discussion, full of ideas and the occasional sharp elbow.

Opinion polls might well favor Bailey and Wheeler (though such polls have been remarkably few and far between, so far), but in the eyes of a crowd containing homeless people, advocates, and other interested citizens, Sponberg and Schor seemed to shine the brightest.

Sponberg, in particular, routinely got the evening’s loudest applause, with answers that were very, very short on policy proposals, but long on a history of assisting homeless Portlanders.

“What’s the most tired you’ve ever been in your life?” Sponberg asked the crowd, ordering them to look out of the mission’s windows, at the homeless people traversing West Burnside. “What’s the most exhausted? But somehow you just keep waking up.”

He mocked Bailey, who’d offered a campaign-style vignette of serving breakfast to homeless youth, and scoffed at millionaire Wheeler’s insistence that “any one of us in this room could find ourselves… homeless.”

Schor, an assistant attorney general with the Oregon Department of Justice, won audience enthusiasm for repeatedly excoriating the practice of criminalizing homelessness—which the city’s done for years.

Iannarone and Davis had their moments, too. So did Bailey. So did Wheeler.

Instead of a pissing match, what emerged with the full slate of candidates was an honest-to-god conversation about the city’s homelessness crisis.

No matter who emerges as the city’s next mayor, it’s the kind of thing this race should aspire to more often.

I'm a news reporter for the Mercury. I've spent a lot of the last decade in journalism — covering tragedy and chicanery in the hills of southwest Missouri, politics in Washington, D.C., and other matters...

6 replies on “Hall Monitor”

  1. Yes! Why have all the major candidate forums decided that it’s okay to shut out all but two most well connected candidates? Shame on Wheeler and Bailey for accepting invites to public forums that exclude others.

  2. I am co-organizing a public letter to the Oregonian newspaper’s management, letting them know in no uncertain terms that We the People of Portland insist that they invite all six mayoral candidates to their upcoming “debate” on February 29 or expect to have their event cancelled by a mobilized citizenry who is sick and tired of corporate media deciding FOR us who the serious candidates are. If we are to reclaim our society from large corporations, which is certainly the work that Bernie Sanders is so successfully putting forward as Priority #1, the same is certainly true here, where OUR daily newspaper corporation is claiming that two mayoral candidates are the “leading candidates”. Based on what? How rich they are? How many of the Portland ruling elite are supporting them? Enough already. I urge anyone reading this who wishes to join our quickly-being-organized campaign to contact me ASAP for more info – Paul Cienfuegos – paul@100fires.com. Thanks!

  3. To exclude any candidate who has registered for the elected office is just sad. Bailey and Wheeler have a chance to show some style by saying no to forums that will not include all the candidates.

Comments are closed.