The landlords have lost their spark.
In late July, Portland City Council considered a new policy that would require landlords to register each of their rental units with the cityโs housing bureauโand pay the city $60 per unit every year. The funds would go toward the cityโs burgeoning Rental Services Office, which focuses on overseeing Portlandโs relatively new slate of pro-renter regulations and helping educate tenants about their legal rights.
Two years ago, a proposal like this would have packed council chambers with worried landlords, irate lobbyists, and flustered property management companies. A landlord would get into a yelling match with a city commissioner. At least one person would slam their fist on a table.
But the July 31 meeting only brought out a handful of weary-looking landlords to contest the new registration fees. No one raised their voices, and everyone thanked the commissioners for their time. A week later, the new policy was approved.
What happened?
The past two years have seen an unprecedented rise in pro-renter policymaking in Portland, beginning with Commissioner Chloe Eudalyโs hotly debated pitch in 2017 to require landlords to help cover moving fees for their evicted or priced-out tenants. Eudalyโs policy drew a barrage of oppositionโand a lawsuitโfrom Portland landlords who had grown accustomed to a largely unregulated market. But in March 2018, the policy was enshrined by a unanimous City Council vote.
A few months later, the city suggested that all landlords owning older, unstable buildings pay thousands to reinforce their wobbly propertiesโor warn all who enter their buildings that they might be crushed in an earthquake.
But the tipping point came earlier this year, when Portland property owners were smacked with two pro-tenant policies. One was another city ordinance from Eudalyโs office that would both regulate security deposits and reward landlords who ditch discriminatory screening criteria for prospective tenants. At the same time, the state legislature proposed a bill that would cap annual rent increases at 7 percent and ban no-cause evictions for long-term tenants.
Despite a well-organized outcry from landlords, both policies went into effect.
By the time those registration fees landed in council chambers in July, it seemed the landlord bloc had finally gotten the message: Lawmakers are done with favoring property ownersโ wants over tenantโs rights.
That includes Mayor Ted Wheeler. While Wheeler ran in 2016 on a platform to improve rentersโ rights, heโs often parroted landlord talking points during City Council meetings. His campaign promises were easily overshadowed by Eudalyโs work to enact meaningful pro-renter policiesโand Wheeler seemed content to let Eudaly serve as an easy antagonist for the landlord lobby. But unlike previous tenant-supporting policies, Julyโs rental registration proposal came from Wheelerโs officeโsignaling an alliance with Eudaly.
It seems landlordsโ last ally may be in Commissioner Amanda Fritz, who plans on leaving office at the end of 2020.
โI would have supported this if it had come to us last year, before all the other changes,โ Fritz said on August 7, before casting the lone council vote against the policy. โI agree that we need a rental registration program… However, on top of all the other additional regulations that weโve put on landlords… itโs regressive.โ
Even then, Fritzโs comments felt more like sympathy for a losing team than support.
The shift in City Hallโs landlord appeal can only mean one of two things: Either Portlandโs pro-tenant movement has successfully made rentersโ rights mainstream, or the landlord lobby is simply licking its wounds before mounting another fight.

Landlords arenโt โfatiguedโ, Alex. Theyโve just simply figured out that these news laws and fees are an additional cost of doing business in Portland and that like other business expenses, they can just pass it along to their tenants in the form of higher rents of up to 10% increase per year. Also, donโt confuse silence for โfatigueโ. Landlords have also figured out they can sell and make a tidy profit while the new owners continue on with a profit making business. And given that all these new fees and laws are suppressing needed new rental housing supply, especially affordable private market supply, real estate investments continue to hold steady. The silence isnโt landlord โfatigueโ. Itโs simply landlords continuing to hum along while itโs the tenants who are the ones paying the price.
I own two single family rentals, and will pass this fee along to them at lease renewal time.
This is a funny little propaganda piece. There is actually another possibility: landlords know this council is stacked against them and aren’t wasting their time. We’ve seen from the article in the O how little respect homeowners are given, Council’s disdain for landlords is a hundred times that. Who on earth wants to subject themselves to that?
So landlords have ether quit – notice all those humble single family houses being demolished all over the city? Those USED TO BE affordable rentals. We should start calling it the pre-Chloe era. OR they are playing the game and just passing this fee (and all the others) onto the tenant. Either way the tenant loses.
You seem to be suggesting that the Legislature has stopped listening to the landlord lobbyists. That’s absurd. The renter protection bill won’t have any serious impact, and that’s a direct result of the lockdown control that landlords have over some State Senators. Renter advocates were sidelined in Salem this year, as everybody down there was well aware.
If The Mercury wants to cover this issue, try getting the facts right.