Credit: photos by Thomas Teal

PORTLAND’S NEWEST unsanctioned houseless community popped up on Sunday morning, on city-owned land in a woodsy corner of deep Northeast Portland.

Led by veteran homeless activists Lisa Lake, Steve Kimes, and Ibrahim Mubarak, a dozen volunteers arranged tents on heavy wooden platforms and erected carports for makeshift communal spaces amidst groves of cottonwoods along the Columbia River Slough. The “Village of Hope” was born.

How long city officials will allow it to exist is an open question.

The new community is similar to established self-managed homeless villages like Right 2 Dream Too and Hazelnut Grove, which also sprang up against the wishes of city officials. But it’s the first such encampment to emerge under Mayor Ted Wheeler—who has presided over an increase in sweeps of the homeless population and campsite cleanups.

The new village also appears to be the first located on a piece of land owned by Portland Parks and Recreation: the 115-acre Big Four Corners Natural Area, at the city’s far northeast corner, contains the slough’s meandering waters and wetland meadows and is home to deer, coyotes, river otters, and 175 bird species. (It’s zoned for industrial use.)

The encampment has emerged as city and county officials dump millions of dollars into creating new homeless shelters and deeply affordable housing, and as advocates complain that progress is too slow. In a statement, village organizers argued that officials “are making progress, but many people continue to fall between the cracks. Their shelter development processes have engendered intense neighborhood conflicts and come with huge price tags.”

“Let’s prove how stabilization, for not a lot of money, can work wonders,” Lake said at a January 16 meeting where organizers planned the camp.

On Monday, city officials’ responses to the village included stern language, but few specifics.

“The outright appropriation of environmentally sensitive public lands, intended for the use of everyone, is unacceptable,” Mayor Ted Wheeler said in a statement. “Rigid structures should not be constructed on lands the public has invested in heavily to preserve…. We will work with the Parks Bureau to quickly address this situation.”

Asked whether that meant the city would post a notice of its intention to clear the camp, the mayor’s office deferred to parks officials. By Tuesday afternoon, the parks bureau had told the camp to clear out, advocates said.

As of Monday, Village of Hope consisted of 10 tents on wooden platforms, two communal areas (a kitchen and a community center), and muddy paths strewn with woodchips. Five people slept there on Monday night, Kimes said, and four more planned to move in this week. Central City Concern is picking up trash, and a portable toilet was scheduled for delivery Tuesday afternoon.

For its first three residents—managers Robert Aquino, Kerry Wheeler, and John “Thumper” Boggs—Village of Hope is about stability and safety.

“This camp is like everything to me right now,” said Kerry Wheeler, who, like Aquino and Boggs, has been homeless for years. “I just need a place to be, and I can’t be alone—it’s scary out here.”

The Big Four Corners Natural Area is surrounded by warehouses and industry, but honeycombed with paths. It’s a surprisingly remote urban wilderness, and Aquino, Boggs, and Wheeler know its secrets as well as anyone.

“I actually camped right over there,” Aquino said on Sunday, pointing to a nearby patch of woods. Wheeler says she recently lived for nearly a year on the exact spot where the village now sits.

Part of what the Village of Hope intends to remedy is the continual displacement of houseless camps throughout Portland. Aquino said he’s been forced to move 20 times in the last two months. Kerry Wheeler said she’s had to relocate eight times within the same period.

“Lance would follow a chipmunk trail to find you,” said Aquino, referring to Lance Hamel, owner of Rapid Response Bio Clean, a city subcontractor that clears camps around town.

Village of Hope’s advocates say their project won’t be introducing a new homeless population into Big Four Corners. And Kimes insists the village will actually protect local ecology by providing structure and regular cleaning. On Sunday, volunteers laid down wood chips to protect paths, and cleaned up nearly a dumpster’s worth of garbage.

Still, positioning platforms necessitated cutting undergrowth and breaking small limbs, and the prospect of harm to the natural area will likely be the new village’s biggest obstacle.

“Encampments are not sustainable in a park or natural area,” says Commissioner Amanda Fritz, who oversees the parks bureau and emphasized the land’s “fragile wetlands and streams.”

The village’s location choice is part of a citywide trend. Last year’s “point in time” count of homelessness in Multnomah County suggested the unsheltered homeless population is generally spreading out from downtown and more expensive and closer-in neighborhoods.

“[The site choice] was deliberate,” says Boggs. “Nobody wants this in their neighborhood.”

That includes some in the Wilkes neighborhood around the natural area.

Jess Ordower, a partner at nearby manufacturer Udoxi Scientific, showed up at the village on Monday for a frank back-and-forth with village co-founder Lake. He described the camp as a “middle finger in the face of society.”

In the past, Ordower said, campers left “hundreds” of latrine holes in the natural area. He blamed previous residents for a propane tank explosion, vandalism, electricity theft, and more. He doesn’t think his new neighbors will be different.

“People should not just be living right there,” Ordower said. “I have empathy for them, but I don’t feel that’s the proper way to shelter them and bring them back into society.”

The Village of Hope marks the second time Lake has mounted an incursion onto city land in recent years.

In May of 2016, she and other advocates swooped onto a piece of city-owned land near Lents Town Center to set up a camp that was to serve as a sanctuary for homeless domestic violence survivors. The group stuck it out on the site for a number of days, but left when the office of then-Mayor Charlie Hales vowed to find them another city-owned plot. That never happened.

Lake says she’s learned from her last go-round with the city: “Don’t give up your stronghold until you absolutely have to.”

Like the 2016 project, the Village of Hope has been in the works for some time.

In the January 16 planning meeting attended by the Mercury, co-founders Lake, Kimes, Mubarak, and a dozen others strategized how to set up the new village, how to support its residents, and what to do if the city opposed it. They batted around names for the community, and talked about creating an Amazon wish list for supplies.

The organizers contrast their vision with Kenton Women’s Village, the North Portland houseless community blessed by the City of Portland and overseen by Catholic Charities. That arrangement has rankled some advocates, who say houseless communities should be able to manage themselves. Village of Hope residents, Lake said, will make their own decisions.

“They’re going to drive the train, we’re just going to lay the tracks down,” she said. “Let’s start out here and prove to the—for lack of a better word—NIMBYs that it can look nice, can be a great resource. Maybe we’ll start introducing these into neighborhoods.”

Even if it avoids a crackdown from authorities, the Village of Hope will have its work cut out for it, as evidenced by the personal challenges its managers are overcoming: Boggs has a history of incarceration and addiction. (He jokes that his former drug of choice was “yes.”) Wheeler uses a walker and has multiple health problems, she says. Aquino says he’s houseless by choice.

“We’re not here to hurt anybody,” Wheeler said. “We need a little quality of life.”

8 replies on “Portland Has a Brand New Houseless Community”

  1. They want to make their own decisions…….
    I decide I want free land, I decide I want free food,
    I decide I want free shelter, I decide I want free drugs,
    I decide to beg or steal for free stuff, I decide to be addicted
    and homeless for years while using the bleeding hearts
    hopes I can be returned to productive society as a sop for
    freedom. I guess if the Village Idiot can run a con, then
    so can these people.

  2. Moved in on Sunday….”a portable toilet was scheduled for delivery Tuesday afternoon.”

    Where have they been going to the restroom for those three days?

    “Cleaned up a dumpster’s worth of garbage.” Left by people who have been camping in that area for the last 2 years (at least).

    Oops… I forgot that if you raise these issues or question any homeless advocates position, you’re just a big, bad taxpaying homeowner who wants special treatment!

  3. I support camps and settlements for people to live in. Houseless people are just as important as people who work hard to afford their rent or mortgage. When people are seen as unwanted that effects their desire to participate in a society that hates them. Thus it may translate into a big middle finger and not caring if they trash your neighborhood. When one person lives in a mansion and another can’t find a place to set up a tent. This is a big red flag that something is WROnG!!! We are all in this together. An injury to one is an injury to all. No one chooses to be born in this cold world. Don’t hate the player, hate the game!

  4. @mite115: I personally hate the used needles strewn on the ground (27,787 used needles were picked up downtown in 2017) the piles and piles of garbage/debris left behind, the stripped bike frames, the buckets of human waste, the environmental devastation, and the attitude of some on the left that these things don’t even exist.

    “Houseless people are just as important as people who work hard to afford their rent or mortgage.” Except it is solely the responsibility of those who pay taxes to foot the bill to clean up the things I listed above. When the city or county says it’s spent tens of millions on the homeless issue, that’s tens of millions in tax money provided by the people who work.

    Sadly, the problem doesn’t seem to be getting any better and tens of millions more in tax money will be spent likely without much change.

    People in Portland (myself included) were upset when the Bundy clan took over the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge (public land), but apparently if you’re homeless, those same people (myself excluded) will protest at city hall in support of you taking over public lands.

  5. “Big Four Corners is one of Portland’s core habitat areas. It provides important
    habitat for deer, coyotes, river otter, and a variety of birds and amphibians.
    More than 175 species of birds use the Columbia Slough Watershed. Water
    quality benefits include protecting cold water sources to the Slough and providing
    the opportunity for restoration work to shade the Slough.”

    (from the PDF linked in the article)

    But fuck those stupid otters and their water quality and shit, right? Especially to support one who is, again quoting the article, “houseless by choice”.

    We haven’t even begun recovering from the Eagle Creek fire. Haven’t we had enough destruction of our natural spaces for one year?

  6. Fuck these people. It’s a natural area, already challenged by proposed depredation by the Port of Portland. People need to be housed. Natural areas around the city are priceless and need to be preserved and enhanced as well. These assholes want to make those two ideas mutually exclusive. They need to move on, or be removed, now.

  7. Welcome to the future. A lot of the self-righteous folk commenting on these stories, who engage in the freedom to cast aspersions as far as their small minds and big mouths can broadcast them, will be in the same boat. Every decade more and more people are unable to meet their cost of living without making concessions to chinese-slum living conditions. I look forward to meeting them in the future; I wonder how many of them will turn into the parasitic drunks/addicts they seem to think every person is who lives on the streets or in subsidized housing. (How better to cope with one’s past mistakes and present struggles, than to blame the victims of a callous society that values land and money over decency and autonomy?)

    But, all cultural partisan disdain aside, this is not the place to be setting up a camp. As our city grows, so does our need for green spaces; not only do the tame the ugliness of human architecture, but they also tame the ugliness that arises in the heart of a corporate sell-out consumer urban professional class that struggles to maintain a quality of life that is more expensive to maintain with every passing year. Locations like the current one R2D2 occupies are ideal: not only don’t they take up green space, but they aren’t close enough to residential neighborhoods to incite the locals into pitchfork-and-torches hostility (though of course it won’t stop some impotent narcissists from pissing in the well of the Internet, like bosses lol).

Comments are closed.