WITH ALL THE TALK of Portland aiming to become the most sustainable city in America, it’s easy to forget that a Superfund site (known as the Willamette River) cuts through our heart. Though the majority of toxic emissions come from city sources and private homes, the large industrial facilities cannot be ignored.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Toxics Release Inventory collects data on emissions of over 650 harmful substances, including heavy metals and “persistent organic pollutants” like DDT.
Here are the big winners: the top five industrial emitters of toxic chemicals to Portland’s air, water, and land.
1. SAPA Extrusions, Inc. (7933 NE 21st)
Pounds of toxic chemicals released in 2008: 1,015,100
SAPA is an aluminum extruder, meaning that they mold aluminum into shapes for many purposes, including bike frames and machine parts. Their emissions include 995,962 pounds of sulfuric acid that went into Portland’s air. Breathing air with concentrations of sulfuric acid can cause damage to the respiratory system, especially among children. SAPA representatives did not return repeated calls for comment.
2. Siltronic Corporation (7200 NW Front)
Pounds of toxic chemicals released in 2008: 569,963
Siltronic is a major employer in job-strapped Portland, with its 850 workers building silicon wafers for semiconductors. Company spokesman Tom Fahey says the semiconductor business is a “very clean industry,” but the fact stands that Siltronic emits an awful lot of chemicals into the water.
Just this past week, Siltronic pressed Portland City Hall to grant them an exemption from Portland’s River Plan, hoping to avoid time-consuming environmental oversight processes if it chooses to expand further on its 80-acre lot near Forest Park. The River Plan is a city project with twin goals of economic prosperity on the waterfront and conservation of natural habitats on the Willamette River.
In exchange for an exemption from the plan’s new “River Review Process,” Siltronic would give Portland use of a seven-acre strip of land on the edge of its property as an environmental restoration site. Fahey says an underground stream there could be uncovered, and there might someday be salmon in this water, just yards up the river from where Siltronic discharges 567,528 pounds of nitric compounds a year.
3. Arclin Surfaces, Inc. (2301 N Columbia)
Pounds of toxic chemicals released in 2008: 309,681
In its 105-year-old factory, Arclin Surfaces’ 35 employees produce special coatings and surfacing “solutions” used in construction and building. Their emissions, including methanol and formaldehyde, go into the air from machines called “paper treaters.”
Arclin spokesman Kevin Griffin says that the company spent $1 million in 2009 on a new thermal oxidizer to reduce air emissions. So hopefully we’ll be inhaling less of their toxins soon.
4. ESCO Corporation (2141 NW 25th)
Pounds of toxic chemicals released in 2008: 206,390
Scrap metal recycler ESCO has snagged media attention recently for its proximity to schools and communities. Neighbor Mary Peveto started a campaign last year to clean up the factory, after reading that the emission levels near her daughter’s Chapman Elementary School were among the worst in the country [“Breathing Wheezy,” News, Aug 13, 2009].
ESCO’s 750 employees recycle scrap steel into new steel products, a process that produces air emissions that include metals. ESCO’s Manager of Environmental Affairs Carter Webb says the company has heard its neighbors’ concerns “loud and clear,” and Peveto, surprise surprise, agrees. “ESCO has been engaged and willing to address their contribution to the problem,” says Peveto.
5. Cascade General (5555 N Channel)
Pounds of toxic chemicals released in 2008: 189,036
Cascade General is the largest ship repair facility on the West Coast, located right here in North Portland. Pollutants at Cascade General come from the yard’s painting and sandblasting operations.
Some of the shipyard’s 850 employees paint ships using spray guns, and “overspray” results in toxic chemicals entering the air and water system. When ships are sandblasted, layers of copper and zinc turn into dust that spreads into the air.
Since the latest EPA numbers were released, Cascade General says it has invested in “paint simulators” to make workers more accurate with paint.

TRI reporting may not be the best measure of the top 10 polluters
Siltronics:
The property that Siltronics is “donating for favors” is adjacent to(only the RR tracks dividing it)a highly polluted area where Rhone Pullanc manufactured agent orange. The area is so polluted that DEQ at the Jan. PHCAG meeting annouced they wanted to solidify a slip of water located next to the RR tracks directly across from the property that Siltronecs intends to donate. The reason it that is so toxic, they did not want any life form to interact with it. Daylighting a creek in this area opens up the possibility of contaminating the river further with horrible toxic chemicals. The estimate to clean this property according to the city is 60 million dollars. The RR sprays herbicides on the tracks which would also create an avenue for toxics to the river if it was daylighted. Nor is the property to be donated wide enough for a wildlife corridor according to Bob Salinger of The Audubon Society.
Seem like Portland isn’t living up to the hype of being a green city! Boy was I surprised when I moved here from NJ 6 years ago only to find the air is worse here than in NJ. That’s why I got involved in Neighbors for Clean Air (NCA). We’ve been able to stop the DEQ’s rubber stamping ESCO’s air emissions permit renewal. It’s been a slog, but we’re making progress. I encourage everyone to get involved in their local neighborhood air quality organization (almost every neighborhood has one). If you can’t find one, join NCA at whatsinourair.org
mappersdelight: Right you are on the limitations of TRI, but it is the best we have. DEQ makes getting emissions inventory data near impossible. TRI is widely accepted as being under reported.
pdxair- I totally agree.
other sources of info about facilities in your area-
Check out the EPA Enforcement & Compliance History database: http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/
You can search for facilities in your area, see who has had formal enforcement actions, etc
also check out the EPA Envirofacts databases: http://www.epa.gov/enviro/index.html
they have spatial data & listings by program or pollutant.
again… it all depends on state and federal enforcement and various reporting limitations (or lack of reporting & enforcement).
In addition to the superfund pollution, when you look at the W water for temperature, agricultural runoff, and other health measures, the river is in very poor shape.
I thought Portland’s top five polluters were Sam Adams, Randy Leonard, Dan Saltzman, Nick Fish and Amanda Fritz.
‘the semiconductor business is a “very clean industry,”‘ BAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
What about the airport?