A HANDFUL OF VOLUNTEERS in Lents are in the hot seat to
decide whether professional baseball will continue to exist in
Portland, in a rare instance of actual city planning power resting
outside city hall.
The Lents Urban Renewal Advisory Committee (URAC) is expecting to
vote next week on whether to delay $42 million in planned urban renewal
projects like building sidewalks and affordable housing, to instead
fund construction of a new Beavers Triple-A ballpark. City officials
promise the stadium will revitalize the downtrodden neighborhood, but
as the voting deadline nears, neighbors are split and many of their
questions still unanswered.
The stadium’s powerful backersโMayor Sam Adams and
Commissioner Randy Leonardโpromise they will follow the lead of
the neighbors.
“At this point it comes down to what the people on the Lents URAC
decide is a good investment,” says Adams’ spokesman, Roy Kaufmann. If
the group votes down the stadium, the city is out of options for where
to relocate the Beavers after Major League Soccer moves into PGE Park.
Without a supportive Lents vote, says Kaufmann, “We don’t see an
opportunity for baseball to stay in Portland.”
The URAC is a volunteer group of 15 homeowners, and business and
nonprofit representatives who do not usually get thrust into the
limelight. Several have lived in the area for decades and all have
close ties to the communityโwhich means they feel the fallout of
their yea or nay vote on the highly politicized deal that decides the
future of their neighborhood.
Only eight of the 15 URAC members responded to requests to comment,
and of those, one was so worried about the personal repercussions for
his support of the stadium deal that he refused to go on record
publicly.
“As soon as your name gets out there that you support it, there’s a
very vocal group that hounds you,” says the committee member. Committee
chair Cora Potter has been the most outspoken link between the city and
the neighbors. While she has taken flack online and in meetings for her
support of the stadium, this week she said carefully that she wants to
see “the full details of the proposal” before deciding how to vote. “In
my mind, there is no deal to oppose yet.”
Last week, the Mercury discovered that the mayor’s office had
commissioned a one-day study into how many jobs stadium construction
would create [“Sitting on the Truth,” News, May 28]. The rushed results
are embarrassing for the mayor’s office: The $49 million total
investment would actually create a short-term net loss of 182 jobs,
according to the report. The mayor’s office cancelled any further study
of the stadium’s economic impact on the neighborhood, so it is likely
that the URAC vote will be based on the stadium’s impact on the area’s
pride and character.
At least five members of the URAC oppose the current deal. While
some businesses in the area strongly support bringing the Beavers to
Lents, the two business representatives on the URAC are less
enthused.
Gary Sargent, who runs a car dealership in Southeast, says he became
skeptical when Leonard could not answer his “basic business 101”
questions about the deal. The current deal does not specify who will
pay for cost overruns and how many years the Beavers must remain in the
stadium.
“Lents needs a business anchor, but I don’t think I’d be doing the
business community any favors if I vote in favor of a stadium that
could get abandoned,” says Sargent, who is on the fence but would vote
against the deal if those questions are not answered. “People are
living on dirt roads in Lents and we’re thinking of delaying these
improvements to build the stadium.”
“If someone applied for a business loan with the criteria they had,
they’d be turned down,” echoes real estate broker and committee member
Charlie Braymen.
“Right now I haven’t been presented with enough positive information
that this would be better than the scheduled urban renewal
improvements,” says committee member (and descendent of Lents founder
Oliver P. Lent) Rachel Lent Cunningham. “Everything on this project
feels rushed.”
Meanwhile, a group of neighbors calling themselves Friends of Lents
Park organized to meet on Wednesday, June 3, to protest the planned
stadium location. Swing council vote Dan Saltzman is also still
undecided on the deal.

Statements from the Mayor’s spokesman that basically place put these folks in the hot seat at this point, seems premature and even unfair.
The advisory committee can hardly rule on the efficacy of an “investment in Lents” when their key questions have not been fully addressed.
Baseball, soccer, football, jai alai, whatever. If Merritt Paulson is behind it, I don’t think I’ll feel comfortable supporting it after this latest attempt to strongarm public funds for his private business.
That the deed of the land to Portland states that the park “shall be used and occupied exclusively for public park and playground purposes” or else Portland looses the land should end consideration of Lents Park for Merritt Paulson’s land grab, unless the city wants to fight for this in court.