EDITOR’S NOTE: The following essay is a guest editorial co-written by two volunteers from the Mental Health Association of Portlandโ€”a respected local voice on mental health policy and police accountabilityโ€”regarding their work on an important national project that strives to better track people who’ve been killed in police shootings here and elsewhere else in America.

SINCE THE DEATH of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 9, attention has been riveted on the issue of police brutality.

Pundits were shocked to discover no national oversight of local police departmentsโ€”and no national database of persons killed by law enforcement officers.

On August 15, an article in USA Today cited FBI estimates of 400 police-involved deaths a year. But, it went on to note, those estimates were based on a small fraction of the 17,000 law enforcement agencies nationwideโ€”those that chose to report “justifiable” police homicides.

Frankly, we’re more interested in police homicides that are not justifiable. Who keeps that list?

For more than a dozen years, Wikipedia has crowd-sourced a list of deaths caused by US law enforcement officers. Last month, we collaborated with 44 “Wikipedians”โ€”the highly involved, active volunteers at the heart of Wikipediaโ€”to source, distill, and verify a comprehensive-as-possible list of people killed by US law enforcement officers in August 2014, and add to the existing list for prior months and years. Names were culled from thousands of mainstream media articles. Each case was confirmed in at least one media source, often the paper of record for its community.

The total for August alone? One hundred and four deaths.

You can review the list on Wikipedia as “List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, August 2014.

Of course, 104 a month, over 12 months, would come to 1,248 deathsโ€”an annual count significantly higher than the FBI’s estimate of 400. Even if August’s count happened to be unusually highโ€”say, twice the actual average monthly numberโ€”the real annual count would still be higher than the FBI’s.

The majority of those killed this August were, from all appearances, flat-out crooksโ€”often armed, often shooting, often extremely dangerousโ€”in situations where even hard-line pacifists and Buddhist monks would be tempted to grab a weapon and aim where it counts.

But a closer reading of the list will make an honest American cry.

Innocent bystanders diedโ€”three of them. Four officers committed suicide. Twelve people, like Michael Brown, were younger than 21โ€”just starting out in life.

Manyโ€”it’s impossible to say how many, but it’s quite clear it was too manyโ€”were affected by mental illness, alcohol, or drugs. Law enforcement officers killed people with mental illness in Arizona, Michigan, Colorado, Maryland, Alabama, New Jersey, Kansas, Missouri, California, and our state of Oregon.

There were men killed while raging against their own familiesโ€”wives, girlfriends, mothers, daughters, granddaughters. Often these men were drunk, and their final stupid act was pointing a gun at officers.

But there were othersโ€”with tragedy stretching beyond spilled blood and shattered families, to media indifference, a blue wall of silence, and the crush of universal inattention.

โ€ข Joe Jennings, 18 and living in Kansas, wasn’t out of the psych ward three hours before being shot to death.

โ€ข John Crawford, a 22-year-old in suburban Dayton, Ohio, was playing with a BB gun in a Walmart when he was shot and killed.

โ€ข Diana Showman, 19, of San Jose, pointed a power drill at police, who shot and killed her. She had bipolar disorder.

โ€ข According to witnesses, Ezell Ford, 25, of Los Angeles, was lying on the sidewalk, arms outstretched, when officers shot him to death. He had a mental illness.

โ€ข Jeremy Lake, 19, of Tulsa, was killed by his girlfriend’s parentsโ€”both of whom were Tulsa police officers.

We know police often make important mistakes in their first report to the media. That’s understandable, considering the inevitable chaos surrounding any officer-involved death. But sadly, the media often don’t return to the first, unverified, and mistake-prone stories to put things right. There have been instances, for example, of early reports saying, “He was armed.” Later it develops there was never a weapon. This detail goes unreported, but is repeated by members of the public as justifying police actions.

The list has pathos, but also patterns.

More often than not, the shooter was a surprised sheriff’s deputy in a rural area, without the organized training or immediate backup that may be available to urban counterparts.

Locating any racial patterns proves more difficult. To make a fair determination, we searched for photographs or media descriptions of race for each person. But photographs are an unreliable source for raceโ€”and we’re urging better-resourced researchers to take on the task and improve our results. We excluded people whose race we could not determine (18), bystanders killed (3), murders (4), and suicides (4), leaving 75 on-duty intentional deaths.

Of these 75, 29 were white, 24 black, 20 Hispanic, and two Asian. Which means 61 percent of people killed by law enforcement officers this August were of color. The overrepresentation of non-whites on the list had no simple cause, outside of the cloudy, multi-platform failure we call “the US criminal justice system.”

Our list could be larger. We did not include deaths from chases or where people suicided when confronted by officers. No deaths from acute detox on the jail floor are listed, nor are state executions. We were not able to track people critically injured by shootings who later died; their stories were not reported. Adding those deaths could increase the list by 30 or 40 people.

Some of the deadโ€”such as Kajieme Powell and Michelle Cusseaux, both people with mental illnessโ€”received significant press coverage. But usually local media reworked the police press release and moved on. Lazy, rushed, or indifferentโ€”it’s hard to tell.

In no instance during this single month โ€”as far as we could tellโ€”were charges filed in any on-duty killing; all deaths were deemed justifiable prior to investigation. No mayor apologized to grieving parents, spouses, or children. For a few deaths, people marched in the streets. For others, not even a name was announced.

For all its deficits, we believe our survey offers the best answer so far to the question, “Who’s getting killed by cops?”

And our results demand certain actions:

From local media, curiosity and follow-through. Reporters must avoid simple regurgitation of police talking points. They must publish the name of the person killed, the names of the officers involved. If this information is not available, they need to ask why.

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) must survey all 17,000 law enforcement agencies, not just the handful that choose to report. We need full and accurate numbers, and gathering them should not be the province of the FBI; it is the DOJ that has an interest in civil rights and discrimination.

From local activists we need a unified voice insisting on police accountability for their communitiesโ€”especially the suburban and rural areas where many of these deaths happen. This voice should come from a joining together of organizations representing persons of color and those representing persons with mental illness. In this way alone will we bring appropriate thoughtfulness, via recruitment and evidence-based training, to police agencies everywhere.

12 replies on “Someone Has to Do It”

  1. Use of force suits are extraordinary difficult to win so few are filed in the 94 district and territorial courts. Of PPB deaths, zero out of the past ten have been filed – that I know of.

    If you can find one in August not already on our list I’ll give you a dollar.

  2. I am so fucking sick of J Renaud’s opinions. He speaks for himself only. If he hadn’t slept with half of the journalist in town no one would take him seriously, quote or print his self serving op/eds on a regular basis. According to him he’s the only mental health authority in town. I’ve never seen a resume. Wake up Portland.

  3. If people are too cowardly to sue the police or stop paying police salaries by withholding tax payments, then move out of high tax locals that have large police forces. Portland does not need the one thousand officers that is has on the payroll. Half that number would still be too many. The cost is exorbitant and could be better spent on fixing the hazardous bridges, even if they are controlled by the County. Portland would still benefit and ought to chip in. Fuck the Pigs.

  4. We really would like to see more features, even cover features written in the Mercury like this: thoughtful, well written, significant. The Merc can keep its ironic stories too, but not every one has to be that. The Stranger in Seattle made the transition.

  5. The Editors “note” only shows how IN THE TANK everyone is for J Renaud and The Mental Health Association of Portland. Waiting for a strong expose on this character that has fooled so many, for so long. Jason has all Portland media eating out of his hands. What does he have on [you] that all are lazy enough to quote no other on basically every story? Talk to survivors and ethical, respectable subject matter experts. Not frauds who crave all of the attention for nefarious reasons.

  6. @ Best in show: Meh. Jason Renaud certainly has an agenda, but he isn’t a tool like Dan Handelman. A guy demanding accountability isn’t necessarily your adversary.

  7. @Reymont: I realize now it could be more clear, maybe by using a different color. The name of the wiki article is one big link. The underlining is because it’s a link, even if looks like we underlined it perhaps because that’s our house style for wiki citations.

Comments are closed.