The guy's got a lot of ideas, he's also running a campaign built on small donors and not taking money from the Democratic establishment (i.e. labor). All this wonderful contrast but do you hear his campaign talking about it? Instead it's this mushy shit. When will this campaign draw some contrast? Not sling mud but show the difference.
Bill's going to lose cause no one's going to hear about him, no one's going to hear about him cause the campaign's narrative is about as engaging and original as a democrat talking about education.
There are important differences between these two candidates, it's time Bill starts talking about them.
bradbury is most certainly taking labor's money. Specifically, the OEA's money. Which is why I would never, ever vote for him, much though his condition constrains our sympathy.
The guy's got a lot of ideas, he's also running a campaign built on small donors and not taking money from the Democratic establishment (i.e. labor). All this wonderful contrast but do you hear his campaign talking about it? Instead it's this mushy shit. When will this campaign draw some contrast? Not sling mud but show the difference.
Bill's going to lose cause no one's going to hear about him, no one's going to hear about him cause the campaign's narrative is about as engaging and original as a democrat talking about education.
There are important differences between these two candidates, it's time Bill starts talking about them.
bradbury is most certainly taking labor's money. Specifically, the OEA's money. Which is why I would never, ever vote for him, much though his condition constrains our sympathy.