Well, well, well… what do we have here? A shirtless Tiger Woods gracing the cover of February’s Vanity Fair (AKA the TMZ of the literati set).

TIGER-WOODS-SHIRTLESS-VANITY-FAIR.jpg

I love how VF works the imagery of this pre-scandal Annie Leibovitz photo into their press release, thusly:

Woods “had always been the bionic man in terms of personality, controlling to a fault,” Bissinger writes. He calls the pre-scandal Woods “the perfect man and pitchman for our imperfect times, a charming non-person,” noting that “with Woods, everything was crafted to produce a man of nothing, with no interior–non-threatening and non-controversial.” But “in the end it was the age-old clash of image versus reality…. He deluded himself into thinking he could be something that he wasn’t: untouchable. The greatest feat of his career is that he managed to get away with it for so long in public, the bionic man instead of the human one who hit a fire hydrant.”

Ah, subtlety. Such a 20th century conceit. ANYWAY! The photo does make me think of one thing that I hadn’t considered about Tiger before the scandal broke—and that’s the boner in my trousers. So walk a mile in the mistresses’ eff-me pumps, and truthfully answer the following incredibly scientific (and as subtle as a Vanity Fair feature) Mercury poll:

WOULD YOU TAP THAT?

Bang bang, choo-choo train, let me see you shake that thang. Wm. Steven Humphrey is the editor-in-chief of the Portland Mercury and has held the job since 2000. (So don’t get any funny ideas.)

6 replies on “Shirtless Tiger Woods in <i>Vanity Fair</i>: WOULD YOU TAP THAT?”

  1. Yeah ‘cos you’re yoked eh DAVIS? Lets see ,Tiger gains 20 ibs, his lettuce is falling out and his sex drive is in overtime and he PED’s. Hmmmm

  2. 1) No, doesn’t do anything for me.
    2) People that have 10+ sex partners at the same time just seems like a good way to get an STD.

Comments are closed.