This exchange with Mitt Romney about Seamus the dog is an interesting one:

DIANE SAWYER: As we move away from this primary campaign into the next phase — again, on Yahoo, we got two questions most often, first about Seamus — which as you know is out there forever — would you do it again?

MITT ROMNEY: Certainly not with the attention it’s received.

This continues the trend of way-too-literal Romney responses to questions that provide him with an opportunity to display human emotion. (See also: “I’m running for office, for Pete’s sake. I can’t hire illegals.”) I think both these statements suggest something more about Mitt Romney than just his opinions about pet transportation and undocumented workers. It’s such interesting wording, because the implication is that Romney would do these things again if he didn’t have to face the repercussions. There’s no show of remorse, no consideration of the other side’s perspective. I think this says a whole lot about his style as an executive.

2 replies on “Mitt Romney Would Not Stick His Dog on the Roof Again, Because It Was So Unpopular the First Time”

  1. After 200 pointless hatchet-job blog posts in a row, I’m starting to get the sense that Paul might not like Romney. But please carry on… tell us why the type of tie he wears illustrates why he wants to blow up schools, and why the drink of choice for some other Republican illustrates why Romney wants to take away our right to breath.

Comments are closed.