whocanibenow.jpg

Forgive me for taking this long to fully absorb the recent David Bowie box set, the 12-CD (or 13-LP) Who Can I Be Now? (1974-1976), which came out at the end of September. The box documents the discursive middle years of Bowieโ€™s legendary decadeโ€”that decade being 1970 to 1980, where virtually everything he set to studio tape is indispensable. The new deluxe package is also a sequel to Five Years (1969-1973), another 12-disc box set that documented Bowieโ€™s first steps toward magnificence (1970โ€™s The Man Who Sold the World and 1971โ€™s Hunky Dory) before reinventing himself as glam astro-star Ziggy Stardust, then committing career seppuku by โ€œretiringโ€ onstage in 1973.

Who Can I Be Now? is a big but puzzling packageโ€”it only covers three of Bowieโ€™s essential albums, 1974โ€™s Diamond Dogs, 1975โ€™s Young Americans, and 1976โ€™s Station to Station, while the remaining nine discs are padded out with live sets, alternate mixes, a rejected rough draft for Young Americans, and various and sundry single edits. Despite the same number of discs, it contains a noticeably smaller scope than the previous Five Years box, and the amplified scrutiny on this short period only serves to emphasize that it was indeed the weakest point in that superlative Bowie decadeโ€”the Young Americans album, specifically, is the only studio album he made from 1970 to 1980 that has anything resembling a flaw on it.

Finished with glam rock and still a couple of years away from his Berlin avant-garde breakthroughsโ€”which encompass the justly admired if speciously named โ€œBerlinโ€ trilogy and Bowieโ€™s two excellent collaborative albums with Iggy Popโ€”our ex-Ziggy flailed a little, and began to dabble in American R&B, albeit more as an imitator rather than an innovator (Bowieโ€™s uneasy earliest singles, from 1964 onward, were the first blueprint for this affinity). Itโ€™s surprising to realize that this dabbling resulted in his biggest American hit: 1975โ€™s โ€œFame,” whose success on the charts wouldnโ€™t be equaled until he dabbled again with American-style R&B on 1983โ€™s Letโ€™s Dance.

But this is jumping ahead.

In 1974, with the Spiders from Mars in his rearview mirror, Bowie wrote glam rockโ€™s epitaph with Diamond Dogs. Itโ€™s a brilliant, misunderstood, magisterial swan song for not only the genre but Bowieโ€™s British identityโ€”Dogs was to be the last album he recorded any major portion of in his native homeland, and itโ€™s the sound of Bowie looking for an escape hatch in the Ziggy-fueled spaceship heโ€™d built for himself. As such, it (like 1972โ€™s Ziggy) is a โ€œconceptโ€ album, this time centered on a story made out of the shards from an abandoned project based on George Orwellโ€™s 1984. As a narrative, itโ€™s fine if fractured; as a rock โ€™nโ€™ roll album, itโ€™s dark and glittery and exquisite and rotting and scary and great. In this way, Diamond Dogs also served as a farewell to Bowieโ€™s teenybopper fans, as this was a dark, degenerate story full of drugs and dystopia.

rebelrebel.jpg

It also contains some of Bowieโ€™s best tracks. โ€œRebel Rebelโ€ is undeniable, maybe the best pure riff and melody Bowieโ€™s ever writtenโ€”or at least the simplest and catchiest. The โ€œSweet Thingโ€/โ€œCandidateโ€ medley is the sound of purest mounting dread, and the coffin-opening drone and varispeed-vocals of โ€œWe Are the Deadโ€ make for the eeriest thing heโ€™d concocted since โ€œThe Bewlay Brothers.โ€ Before it degenerates into a repetitive chant that closes the album, the mellotron-laden โ€œBig Brotherโ€ is requiem-mass-as-pop-song, a chilling slice of proggy, groggy weirdness that I never tire of. The album hints at the oblivion that Bowie examines later on Station to Station, but the chilly detachment of that album hadnโ€™t fully taken hold, and as a result Diamond Dogs is wonderfully bloody and alive.

It was the albumโ€™s most conventional song, howeverโ€”the piano-driven ballad โ€œRock โ€™nโ€™ Roll with Me”โ€”that pointed the way forward to Bowie’s “plastic soul” period, but first he dropped a double live album from the Diamond Dogs tour. David Live is presented here in two versions: in the original mix and track listing from 1974, and a remixed version from 2005 with four extra tracks. Neither mix is particularly great (nor is the later one substantially better than the decidedly murky early mix), but this is where the exhaustiveness of the box-set project bites its own tail. A small and anal-retentive part of me is glad for the thoroughness of this type of survey, but I canโ€™t imagine anyone but trainspotters will want four whole discs (five in the vinyl version) taken up with a so-so live album, as it’s a pretty spotty document to begin with. Considering that there are excellent outtakes from all three studio albums that are not included in this set, the inclusion of this complete historical document of David Live is frustrating. (Actually, there’s also a surround-sound remix of it that isn’t here, an omission for truly obsessive completists to gnash their teeth over.)

knockonwood.jpg

For its own part, David Liveโ€”in either versionโ€”is interesting but not particularly satisfying. It recasts Bowieโ€™s back catalog in the light of his new โ€œfascinationโ€ with American R&B and soul music, particularly of the Philly varietal. As such, itโ€™s the unsettled sound of one foot out the door and the other in, and there arenโ€™t any renditions here that best their studio counterparts.

Young Americans is where Bowieโ€™s new musical interests are fully realized, and revisiting it in this context only emphasizes to me how odd a stunt it was for him. The box setโ€™s money-grabโ€”or invaluable historical document, depending on how you look at itโ€”is the inclusion of a โ€œrough draftโ€ version of the album, here titled The Gouster and featuring three songs that didnโ€™t make it to the finished product, plus another three album tracks presented in significantly alternative mixes. Whether or not Bowie ever thought of The Gouster as a finished work is up for debateโ€”most hardcore fans seem to think he did notโ€”but itโ€™s a slightly purer, less distilled version of Bowieโ€™s vision for the project, and it does do one very important thing: It puts the magnificent โ€œWho Can I Be Now?โ€ back in a place of prominence, housed as a proper album track (and providing this set with its title). This is one of the best โ€œunreleasedโ€ tracks in Bowieโ€™s catalog (although itโ€™s been available as a bonus track on earlier CD editions of Young Americans, and actually sounds a tad muddy in this incarnation by comparison), and it confronts Bowieโ€™s existential angst and identity crisis head-on. Perhaps for that reason, Bowie deemed it too personal to keep on the album, because its musical merits are beyond reproach.

gouster.jpg

The rest of The Gouster is, unsurprisingly, a not-quite-cooked-through version of Young Americans, and itโ€™s missing some of the finished albumโ€™s definitive tracks: the gorgeous โ€œWin,โ€ the exploratory โ€œFascination,โ€ and the chart-topping โ€œFame.โ€ To Gousterโ€™s credit, it does not include the Bowie/Lennon version of โ€œAcross the Universe,โ€ an okay rendition at best or, depending who you ask, the lone blemish on Bowieโ€™s otherwise perfect track record from 1970 to 1980. While Iโ€™d agree that itโ€™s probably the worst thing he included on an album during that period, for me it only emphasizes my problem with Young Americans, which would be an exceptional album in anyone elseโ€™s discography, but is only a so-so one in Bowieโ€™s. While it’s a remarkable about-face to what came beforeโ€”it sounds radically different from all his previous workโ€”Young Americans is an album of Bowie not wanting to be Bowie anymore, hiding inside Philly-soul tropes and gossamer string arrangements and jazz- and R&B-inflected instrumentation. While itโ€™s not exactly the sound of a thin, white duke in blackface, itโ€™s pretty inauthentic. When Bowie does locate his inner Bowieness within the experiment (โ€œYoung Americans,โ€ โ€œWinโ€), it can be remarkable. But when heโ€™s in imitation mode (โ€œRight,โ€ โ€œCan You Hear Meโ€), heโ€™s more copycat than chameleon. (To his credit, Bowie did fully anticipate the disco craze, and its johnny-come-lately white practitioners, by a good two years.)

Young Americans and โ€œFameโ€ broke Bowie in mainstream America in a way that Ziggy never could, and the newly minted superstar, now living in LA, descended into drugs and isolation, a detour that was grim but thankfully only temporary. The document he left of this period, Station to Station, is a strange and difficult album to grapple with. On the one hand, it shows Bowie at a creative nadir of sorts, containing a mere six songs, some of which are decidedly underwritten. Its singles, โ€œGolden Yearsโ€ and โ€œTVC 15,โ€ are the sound of Bowie trying to capitalize on past gloriesโ€”his plastic soul and sci-fi troubadour periods, respectivelyโ€”and the remaining tracks include a very damaged stab at gospel (โ€œWord on a Wingโ€), the most conventional funk-a-chug tune heโ€™d ever recorded (โ€œStayโ€), and a cover of an over-the-top Johnny Mathis ballad, โ€œWild Is the Windโ€ (although Bowie took Nina Simoneโ€™s rendition as a starting point for his version). That leaves only the title track, a 10-minute overblown epic that takes nearly three minutes to get going, and blatantly echoes the diptych of another established Bowie masterpiece, โ€œThe Width of a Circle.โ€

And yet the album is brilliant. Its shortcomings, when piled together, become strengths. Bowieโ€™s detachment and disorientation, instead of making the album sound hollow and impersonal, lend it an air of sorrow and confusion, drawing the listener in and providing fascinatingly uncharted musical territory to explore. Whatโ€™s astonishing is how thoroughly he’d abandoned his Philly-soul leanings of less than a year ago. To be sure, Station‘s still steeped in R&B, particularly โ€œStay,โ€ โ€œGolden Years,โ€ and โ€œWild Is the Wind,โ€ but it also incorporates Bowieโ€™s developing interests in German krautrock and the jerkier rhythms that would presage new wave.

Station to Stationโ€™s title track is head-and-shoulders the standout. Essentially two songs pasted together, it becomes a manifesto for Bowieโ€™s newest and most dangerous character, the Thin White Duke. The songโ€™s lyric jumble of occultism, Christianity, Kabbalah, Nietzschism, and Nazi imagery has been thoroughly analyzed elsewhere, but musically it simultaneously sweeps up the detritus from all of Bowieโ€™s past selves and points the way forward to his future incarnations. Itโ€™s the sound of escape, depicted quite literally in the form of a train that never stops rolling forward, becoming a prison in itself. And itโ€™s counterbalanced by the albumโ€™s two slower tracks: the aforementioned cover of โ€œWild Is the Wind,โ€ which is almost too gorgeously lush for words; and the Christian-leaning โ€œWord on a Wing,โ€ a painfully miserable song that is more the professing of desperation than of any kind of devotion. “Wing” concludes with a robot choir of angels, further evidence of Bowieโ€™s icily detached hopelessness.

tvc15.jpg

What remains on Who Can I Be Now? is inessential to all but diehard fans. There’s a 2010 remix of Station to Station (itself a fold-down of another absent-from-this-box surround-sound remix) that is inferior to the original in every wayโ€”down to the processed drum sounds and inclusion of discarded elements, such as unnecessary vocal lines on the already crowded-sounding โ€œTVC 15โ€ and a sustained E chord from the band during Bowie’s a cappella refrain in โ€œWild Is the Wind.โ€ Itโ€™ll be interesting to those who want to know every last detail about how the album was constructed, but offers little new musical value.

The other thing is the full tape from a 1976 concert in Long Island (minus a lengthy drum solo during โ€œPanic in Detroitโ€ that has been edited down). This Nassau Coliseum show has been bootlegged and excerpted before, and holds high esteem among Bowie fans, but it sounds clunky and thick to me in this presentation, with every instrument saturated and possessing a high-volume mix that cuts out, among other things, the improvised vocal yelps Bowie did during โ€œStay.โ€ I was excited to hear this recording in full, as itโ€™s been talked about for years by Bowie aficionados, but Iโ€™m pretty disappointed by it. Though there are high points to be sure, the band sounds oddly generic and bombastic, and Bowie sounds uncomfortable with his older legacy songs and not fully in command of the newer material. I would like to spend more time with it, though.

Oh, and thereโ€™s a further bonus: Re:Call 2, which collects the single edits from these periods, 13 shortened versions of tracks that appear earlier in the set. None of these is essential except for the original UK single mix of โ€œRebel Rebel,โ€ which includes a vocal โ€œooh” that didnโ€™t make it to the familiar album version (the US version, too, has gobs more vocals, but is substantially worse). This is for Bowiephiles only, and theyโ€™ll be disappointed that the set doesnโ€™t include outtakes like โ€œDodo,โ€ โ€œAfter Today,โ€ and Bowieโ€™s cover of Springsteenโ€™s โ€œItโ€™s Hard to Be a Saint in the City,” all of which date from this period.

All told, the set does fulfill one of what I assume its two primary goals to be: It sheds new, and deliberately focused, light on a very specific area of David Bowieโ€™s long and diverse career. I feel like I have a better understanding now of the processes and shifts he undertook to get from 1973โ€™s Pin Ups to 1977โ€™s drastically different Low. Bowie’s 1974-76 period is the very definition of transitory, in which his first attempt to reside in America didnโ€™t last particularly long (he tried again later, with better results), but during which he made two troublesome yet unqualified masterpieces. Diamond Dogs and Station to Station acquit themselves with flying colors in this exhaustive presentation.

As for the box setโ€™s other goal? Presuming that itโ€™s to provide a real value to Bowie nuts like myself, I canโ€™t say that it does. All in all, Who Can I Be Now? 1974-1976 is pretty bloated, taking up 12 full-priced discs with iterations of material that couldโ€™ve filled half that space. Am I happy to have The Gouster, two versions of David Live, the remix of Station to Station, and a disc of edited-down hits? Sure. But Iโ€™m hard-pressed to urge Bowie fans to take a similarly costly plunge, especially as the man’s final work has just been released posthumously on the Lazarus cast album. And thereโ€™s no shortage of Bowie reissues to come: A new (and totally unnecessary) hits collection is on the way for January, and a box set of the Berlin yearsโ€”continuing this seriesโ€”is sure to come out around this time next year. Whether you have enough Bowie-loving pennies for all of it is something only you can decide for yourself.

bowiebox.png

Ned Lannamann is a writer and editor in Portland, Oregon. He writes about film, music, TV, books, travel, tech, food, drink, outdoors, and other things.