Credit: Aaron Lee

Here’s the deal with Renata, in case you’ve been living under a Himalayan pink salt rock: On June 17, at the ripe old age of two weeks, The Oregonian named this Pacific-Northwest-ingredients-meets-high-end-Italian hotspot its 2015 Restaurant of the Year.

For this baby restaurant to get the nod sent shockwaves through the food communityโ€”anonymous chefs griped about politics while local food writers were positively apoplectic. To name it the best new outing of the year, after a short soft opening and two weeks of actual service, was… well, too soon.

However, I also think The O’s critic, Michael Russell, had few choices in what has been a dismal year for high-end ambitious openings (although he could have easily picked Doug Adams’ turn as exec chef at Imperial, or the new NW 21st location for St. Jack).

The hullaballoo puts me, a fellow critic, in a tough placeโ€”it’s now impossible to review this Inner Eastside venture on its own merits. When the biggest print game in town swoops in and names Renata the “it” spot, proprietors Sandra and Nick Arnerich and chef Matthew Sigler have more than a lot to live up toโ€”especially taking into account their backgrounds at Northern California icons The French Laundry (the Arneriches) and Flour + Water (Sigler), and the expansive remodel of a former creamery. In short, Renata is marked.

I visited once on June 16, the night before Renata earned its title, and again on August 6, to see how things were settling for Portland’s new darling. It’s clear that Renata is still evolving and tweaking menu flawsโ€”as it should, because even today it’s just over three months old.

In June, the atmosphere in the huge 58-seat dining room, with bar and patio to boot, was electric with anticipation. The space is sprinkled with bright floral arrangements, divided by a wending communal table (that manages to make the most of acoustics), and enough roominess to keep your party from feeling wedgedโ€”a sensation to which Portland eaters are too often subjected. Turn your back, if possible, to the massive red neon sign reading “Mi Piace” or “I like it” in Italian over the open kitchen, lest you wish to be reminded of McDonald’s signs from the ’90s. Big plate-glass windows open onto a well-appointed patio and some sort of Warhol-esque art is over the bar. This is Los Angeles-level build out, down to the two BMWs, two Mercedes, and an Audi SUV in the restaurant’s own dedicated parking lot out front.

The affable but unobtrusive service began with a choice of still or sparkling water out of a glass bottle with the restaurant’s name etched into the side. Drinks are inventive, with flavors straying toward the floral and berriesโ€”the Libertino ($11) with tequila, Campari, Starvation Alley Cranberry, lime, and soda was a refreshing start to our meal. You’ll also want to split a bottle of wine from the sizeable listโ€”this is Italian food, dammit, and it demands grape-based libation.

Liverwurst crostini ($9) with pickled cherries and balsamic onions and a cured king salmon salad ($14) provided a great first impressionโ€”particularly the perfectly preserved salmon, which got a heat boost from horseradish crรจme fraiche, earthiness from beets, a sweet/tart hit from tayberries, and crunch from pistachios. It was also the most beautifully composed plate I’ve seen in months.

The pastas are the real deal, contrasting texture, flavor, and visual appeal with aplomb. An agnolotti dumpling ($19) was made with cocoa, the dough tinged a rich brown with lamb and porcinis inside. The squid ink cavatelli ($18) sprinkles tuna, porkย sausage, clams,ย and Calabrian chilies over short, perfectly chewy jet-black noodles. The Isabella Scarpinocc ($18) was a delightful meeting of chanterelle mushrooms and pine nuts; however, Renata encourages guests to share, which meant our table of three got just two mouthfuls each of this sparse plate.

This is a major consideration while dining at Renata: Plan for at least two, if not more, dishes per person… if you want to walk away satisfied. In August, a seven-plate tour sent two female diners away sated, while our token dude, former Merc critic Chris Onstad, was still hungry. This, as you can see from the menu pricesโ€”yes, gluten fans, that bread basket is $10โ€”adds up.

Veer toward the grill and away from the wood-fired oven. A mixed grill of lamb ($28) was the most generously appointed plate of any visit, with belly, loin, and chop served to perfect tender rareness and piled high with heirloom tomatoes, a ceci bean puree, and a breadcrumb salsa verde. The pizzas are kind of a messโ€”a Pomodoro pie ($17) arrived barely speckled on the bottom, yet with two giant bubbles burnt in the crust on top. The pizzas drag the rest of the menu down, and should be replaced altogether (the recent addition of dishes from the wood-fired oven that aren’t pizza suggests they may be phased out).

I like Renata. But I’m not sure I’ve been adequately convinced that, especially at three months old, it is any different or more noteworthy than Ava Gene’s (Portland Monthly‘s 2013 Restaurant of the Year) or even Nostrana (named Restaurant of the Year by the O in 2006). Both also tout farm-to-table Italian, and both do it just as well. These restaurants are consistently packed, so that’s not to say there isn’t more room at the table for this kind of fareโ€”yet if pressed, I’d recommend the latter two establishments… not Renata. However, it’s still growing up, and unlike some haters, I think it will stand the test of time. Renata is worth a tripโ€”especially if you care about the larger conversation.

Mon-Wed 5:30-10 pm; Thurs-Fri 5:30-11 pm; Sat 5-11 pm (Sun 5-9 pm starting Sept 13). Reservations recommended, but patio is first-come, first-serve. Vegetarians have choices.

Renata

626 SE Main
954-2708
www.renatapdx.com

Andrea Damewood is a food writer and restaurant critic. Her interests include noodle soups, fried chicken, and sparkles.

5 replies on “The House That Hype Built”

  1. Don’t ever use the word “haters.” It has no meaning.
    The Oregonian currently is in the hands of a publisher that seems to want to take a paper that wasn’t especially good in the first place and ruin it utterly. Surreal editorial choices are the rule of the day over there, and I wondered about it when I saw them falling all over this restaurant, too.
    It sounds…like you said; that there’s plenty of other places one could go and have exactly this experience, if not better.
    cue the people who work there/friends of the owners coming here to defend it…

  2. Rich, you do realize that the publisher of the O recently decamped to the (poor, doomed, sorry-for-them because they were kinda great) Eugene Register Guard?

    This does make me wonder: is there are a reason why the ROY is so often newish? Given ups and downs, it seems there should be more focus on existing restaurants that have upped their game – which is harder to do, and which there is less incentive to do when you have established regulars. (For EG: has Raven & Rose gotten any better since that dismal first chef left? Has Jenn Louis done anything to make Lincoln stand out lately?) I’m just waxing philosophical, but mostly, I’m just tired of NEW restaurants.

  3. I did not, rangerhunter. N. Chris is off to destroy another paper, eh?
    And yeah: I keep wondering too why pretty much all restaurant reviews focus on the new ones only, and rarely keep up with how the old venerables are doing, much less how the former flavors-of-the-month are keeping up. Seems like a huge oversight.

  4. To be fair to the O, they also do revisit a lot of old favorites when doing their annual food guide. Unfortunately they tend to be brief, even the top restaurants.

    Also to be fair, Michael Russell claims that the “Restaurant of the Year” isn’t necessarily the best restaurant (Renata was #11 on that list), but some combination of quality and influence on Portland food. As Andrea points out – Renata doesn’t look like other Portland restaurants, and could be a sign of things to come as the city continues to change. And also as Andrea points out – it’s been an oddly slow year for “big” openings.

    Personally? I think they got their two accolades mixed. If they needed something new and impressive, Kachka should have been restaurant of the year rather than Renata. They’re established enough to be a tad more credible, and they’re certainly both excellent and original.

    It’s true that Portland doesn’t really have an “LA style restaurant” like Renata, but Portland also didn’t have a “Vegas style” restaurant like Lucier (or Quartet, ugh) and we all saw how that worked out. Though Renata at least sounds like it’s got the quality to back it up, and maybe in a year it will be a brilliant pick.

Comments are closed.