The new 51-unit Hawthorne apartment complex “The 20” has 29 parking spaces packed into an area that could usually only fit 10, thanks to a high tech robotic car-stacking system. Check out the O‘s video:
| Robo parking at The 20 |
The steel puzzle parking machine is made in Detroit, which is great, but the manufacturer applauds it as sustainable, which is questionable. Less area gobbled up by car parking means more area for high density housing along Hawthorne… but is there really such a thing as a “sustainable” parking spot? (well maybe these ones.)
hm. gives a new meaning to the fantastic book “how to survive a robot uprising” by daniel h wilson
They’ve had these in Japan for 20 years. Nothing new here other than being on a different continent.
And I really doubt that they’re more sustainable, what with all the infrastructure and upkeep and energy being spent to move all those cars around.
They fucking rule. Stop being a buzzkill, Graham.
Auto shops have used lifts for decades to save space on the lot. Interesting innovation.
I’m more concerned that it only fits 29 cars, while the building has 50 units. I bet those other tenants won’t have cars.
Oh wait, yes they will, and they’ll park in front of the neighbor’s house.
They do park in front of the neighbor’s house. My girlfriend lives across the street, and I always used to be able to find a spot in the 1 hour parking there. Now I rarely can, and those cars sure aren’t moved after an hour.
If I had trouble finding a parking spot in my neighborhood, I would definitely be willing to pay for the privilege. Urban space is valuable, and if you don’t charge for it, it often becomes scarce.
Maybe more neighborhoods should move to the model used in NW, where residents can get a parking permit, and anyone without one would be time-limited. Or install meters.
Portland had two “pigeon-hole parking” devices downtown in the 1950s. Required a operator, though.
Long-time fan, first time rant. Can’t you guys afford your own moving images instead of stealing material from crappy OregonLive? I know film processing and computering are expensive, but I hear even some of those wire-less tele-phones are not able to take moving pictures WITH SOUND!