Here’s the Romney campaign’s response to the previously mentioned incredible Obama attack ad:

It’s weak sauce. First of all, you can’t argue against negative campaigning in a negative ad. Second, both Romney and Obama have both used negative ads before, so this is nothing new. What this ad is complaining about is that Obama’s negative ads are working.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=roodiGY0W1A

11 replies on “New Romney Ad Goes Opposite-of-Nuclear on Obama”

  1. They aren’t working for Obama. PC is a constant liar. At least he is consistent. Anyone can do a little research and find that the newest polls show Obama has lost his lead despite spending of millions of dollars slamming Romney’s international business record.

  2. D&W. It’s too early to drink. You gave us all a link to Linsanity. I like Jeremy Lin but what does he have to do with this issue? If you’re talking about the much lower column about Obama that was dated four days ago, keep in mind new poll numbers come out all the time.

    Like this one from Rasmussen. Fresh this morning:

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_con…

    I especially like the part where Democrats are not only losing The White House but in other areas of government. Piss or get off the pot, indeed.

  3. Trolls are people who stalk others but are too chicken to publish an opinion of their own. If I’m such a troll, why are you following me, eldepeche? You’re not proving me wrong. I get to you because you know I’m telling the truth and there is nothing you can do about it. That is why you follow me. So keep on keepin’ on. You make my job much easier.

  4. Ignoring SJR, I’m really not looking forward to Constant telling us for the next three months why Obama is, or should be seen as, doing well, while Romney isn’t or shouldn’t be. It’s embarrassing to read such naked choir-preaching masquerading as worthwhile news.

  5. You should read the other post in the other Romney-bashing Paul Constant thread where he basically says the same thing. Do your homework, ROM. Fuck’s sake.

Comments are closed.