The Portland Police Bureau officer involved in the death of
James Chasse Jr. is facing the threat of another lawsuitโthis
time relating to his use of force against a woman claiming to suffer
from mental health issues.
Chasse, a 42-year-old man with schizophrenia, died in police custody
in 2006. It is now hotly rumored that Officer Christopher Humphreys’
alleged assault of Lisa Ann Coppock occurred just a few days after he
completed Crisis Intervention Training (CIT), the police bureau’s
education in how to diffuse confrontations with people in mental health
crisis (the exact date of Humphreys’ training is not known). The
training was expanded to include all the bureau’s officers in November
2006, in direct response to controversy created by the Chasse
incident.
Attorney J. Ashlee Albies filed a tort claim with the city on
October 21, 2008, giving notice of Coppock’s intention to sue.
“The circumstances that gave rise to Ms. Coppock’s claims arose on
or about April 22, 2008, when Portland Police Officers Christopher
Humphreys and Rod Nusum assaulted, falsely arrested, and discriminated
against Ms. Coppock at the Gresham City Hall transit stop,” alleged
Albies in the claim letter, a copy of which was obtained from the
city’s Office of Risk Management through a public records request.
Albies works for Steenson, Schuman, Tewksbury, Creighton, and Rose,
the same law firm handling the Chasse case [“The Chasse Files,”
Feature, November 15, 2007], but has declined further comment on the
tort claim for the time being.
Further details of the incident are unclear, since it is against
police bureau policy to release use-of-force documentation to the media
while a case is pending criminal trial, or to comment on cases where
litigation is pending. But Coppock was charged with theft of services
in the amount of $50, resisting arrest, and interfering with a police
officer, and is scheduled to stand trial for her alleged offenses at
Multnomah County Circuit Court on February 23.
Coppock’s criminal defense attorney, Maite Uranga with Metropolitan
Public Defender Services, has also declined comment on the case, but
issued a subpoena to Officer Humphreys on January 6 requiring him to
appear at the trial next month, according to records on the Oregon
Judicial Information Network. She also filed Coppock’s notice of intent
to rely on a defense of mental disease or defect, diminished
responsibility, or extreme emotional disturbance on January 7.
Police Chief Rosie Sizer has yet to make a recommendation on
discipline for Humphreys related to an internal affairs investigation
into Chasse’s death, the outcome of which is still unclear.
Humphreys, who has been protected by the city attorney’s office from
having to comment publicly on the Chasse lawsuit, will now be required
to testify in court at Coppock’s trial about his use of force against a
person claiming to suffer from mental health issues. Coppock declined
comment through her attorneys.
Meanwhile, Portland Police Association President Scott Westerman has
been an outspoken defender of Humphreys since he took office last
November, when he told the Mercury, “There’s nothing in the
Chasse incident that CIT training would have helped.”
Regarding the Coppock case, Westerman says, “I don’t want anybody to
assume that Officer Humphreys is automatically guilty of anything, and
the fact that he is named in the suit, to me, is not surprising.” He
continues, “The fact is, his name has been dragged through the media
for three years on a case that should have been resolved two years ago.
I strongly disagree that he is developing a bad apple reputation. He is
one of the hardest working cops that the Portland Police Bureau has,
and just because somebody has a tort claim filed against them does not
assume that the officer has done something wrong.
“Perhaps this woman or her attorney saw the arresting officer’s name
and decided to try to capitalize on it,” Westerman continues. “Down the
road, I am confident he is going to get honorably cleared.”
Westerman says he has also heard from police bureau sources that the
Use of Force Review Board has recommended no discipline for Humphreys
regarding the Chasse case, although that information has yet to be
released by the city, which Westerman describes as “frustrating.”
“We don’t know a lot about the incident yet, but it certainly seems
like Officer Humphreys has had his share of lawsuits filed against
him,” says Copwatch activist Dan Handelman. “Hopefully since the bureau
is now tracking lawsuits against its officers through its employee
information system, this will now lead to some corrective action.”

Officer Humphreys needs to be fired & charged with both muder & assault IMMEDIATELY! How can it be more obvious that this guy is a dangerous, psychopathic thug who needs to be put away?!
This article says nothing.
Tell us the number of such suits filed against police in a given year.
The PPB & the city of Portland (relating to police incidents) is currently facing atleast half a dozen lawsuits, i think that’s quite telling.
it proves that the shrink department needs to do some better psychological screening of all future police officer applicants.
there’s nothing more dangerous than a psychopath with a badge……
“there’s nothing more dangerous than a psychopath with a badge……”
Actually, there is.
It’s a psychopath with a badge, heavily armed, with the “law” on his/her side, & the foolish mis-guided capitulation of waaay too many citizens who’re too stupid & complacent to give a damn about their Rights!
police will continue to kill. they are not held to the same extent of the law. portland police killed my friends brother claiming “self defense” when only min’s earlier he was hit by a car. the radio recording of the event shows the disregard for others lives.
the BART shooting in SF is a prime example of police executing peaceful people.
“there’s nothing more dangerous than a psychopath with a badge…..” Try a psychotic psychiatrist who has authority to use and shoot military rifles who kills people who are on the same side! Who watches the watchers?
Bad apple cops need to be removed, but because they pay their union dues, they get to stay on, unless the public and media brings their un-ethical actions to the fore front and keeps it there, thereby bringing the police station and the other officers into disrepute, then and only then, will the un-ethical officer be shown the door!