Last Wednesday, City Council was scheduled to beef up Portland’s noise ordinance, making it easier for neighbors to complain to police about house parties and shut down rowdy music clubs. Concerned that the changes might silence some of the venues for up-and-coming bands around town, on Monday–two days before the city council’s vote–Mercury Arts Editrix Julianne Shepherd sent a mass e-mail to concert promoters and musicians. She asked them to contact City Councilman Charlie Hales and urge him to re-consider adopting the pending changes.
For the past eight months, Hales’ office has spearheaded the so-called Noise Task Force, a roundtable looking at ways to deal with everything from the sound of jackhammers and airplanes to rowdy neighbors and car stereos. Under the elusive rubric of “livability,” the task force banged out broad protocols for quieting noise from clanging trash lids and rambunctious house parties.
After several musicians responded to Shepherd’s e-mail and contacted Hales’ office, the Mercury received an annoyed phone call from Susan Kelly, the staff member who serves as point person for this project. That morning, she had received several urgent phone calls and was upset; for several patronizing minutes, Kelly explained that noise ordinance did not single out clubs or live music. Furthermore, Kelly assured, musicians had been aptly represented in the Noise Task Force, noting that a concert promoter for the summertime Zoo Music Series had been present.
It was an odd and suspiciously defensive response to the very basic mechanics of democracy: Instead of responding to a concerned constituent, Kelly essentially told Shepherd to cool her heels.
While City Hall has pooh-poohed concerns that the beefed-up noise ordinance could serve as a means to quiet clubs and house parties, the task force’s report is full of foreboding indications that the ordinance may very well be a Trojan Horse that could substantially damage the music community. According to the report submitted by the task force to City Council, the Noise Control Office receives 7,000 complaints annually; over half of these complaints, the report points out, are for bands, music and stereos. (Portland has a Noise Control Office which, technically, is intended to field noise complaints.) The report goes on to say that the Noise Control Office fails to enforce the majority of the complaints for loud music, primarily because they occur at night or on weekends when staff is not available.
Handing off enforcement to police–who, unlike the Noise Control Office, is available round-the-clock–will undoubtedly close this gap between the number of complaints and the ability to enforce them. This is precisely what the recommended changes to the noise ordinance propose. Such stepped-up enforcement translates to troubled times for taverns, house parties and clubs in residential areas. For example, clubs like the now-defunct punk haven EJ’s were railroaded into oblivion by neighbors.
“It killed us,” said one former manager for EJ’s. A single elderly neighbor complained nightly about the noise. “Sometimes,” said the former manager, “[she complained] even when there weren’t any bands playing.”
If passed, the ordinance will demand increased training for police officers to deal more efficiently with noise complaints. Fines will also double, further saddling clubs and businesses with debt. The ordinance concludes that North and Northeast Portland are already maxed out for noise, which means these neighborhoods–and the clubs located in them–will be targeted.
A similar ordinance was recommended in Seattle, but ultimately vetoed by Mayor Paul Schell, who proclaimed that “this is not New York and I’m not Giuliani,” referring to the Big Apple’s recent attempts to sterilize its unique quirks in the name of livability.
Urge City Council to do the same and not adopt the recommended changes. Last Wednesday, after drawn-out testimony to an unrelated matter, City Council was forced to postpone their vote on the proposed changes until this Thursday, July 5 at 2:30 pm. Contact City Council members at (503) 823-4000, and urge them to reject proposed changes to the noise ordinance.
This isn’t really an article, it’s an opinion piece. There needs to be some sort of better law that allows residents to file complaints about noise that will actually accomplish something. Boo fucking hoo if your precious indie music clubs have to tone it down after 11 pm. Other people actually have to work during the day, you whiny cry-baby.
I agree with dadolwch- it all comes down to concern for fellow humans, anybody with a whit of common sense would agree that punk music or any music that is played so loud that people can’t sleep or even think has to be toned down, if you can’t deal with this go out into the dessert and make all the noise you want.
I wonder if the animals at the zoo enjoy the concerts there?
If you choose to live in or near a commercial area, you should be willing to except the fact that some noise may occur after ten p.m. It should not be the job of any business owner whose bread and butter and JOB depend on operating during these “late night” hours to have to tone it down. It is the duty of the citizens willfully living near by such establishments to either join the party, take an ambian, or invest in some ear plugs. Period. If you are a home owner and have owned the property previous to a new business opening nearby your home, you should have either taken action to prevent certain types of new businesses from opening in your area, or realized the area in which you chose to purchase your home had potential for eventually being near a commercial zone. Also, you live in A FUCKING CITY. If you don’t enjoy it, please feel free to relocate elsewhere.