To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
“Mark Warner’s on the twitter machine lying to everyone saying this means it “runs dry” in 2033. I can’t find the new report on the website yet, but the sentence to find is the one that reads something like “After 2033, without changes to the program Social Security will only be able to pay out X% of promised benefits” where X will be something between 75-80 or so and X% will be “higher benefits in real terms than current beneficiaries receive.”
So, uh, not running dry, asshole.”
— eschatonblog.com
Journalism is reporting unquestioningly other people’s commentary on publicly-available source documents, without reading those source documents.
Psst! Under 35? Whether these dates are accurate or not, the handwriting is on the wall: the social safety net that is likely to exist when you and I retire is going to be really, really shitty. Start planning and living accordingly now.
Happy Tuesday!
Seriously, if you have no idea what you’re posting about, why repost some idiotic right wing talking point? I mean, really, do you even look into this stuff before you post it? be a man, print a retraction.
There’s a weird sort of fatalism that always seems to accompany these projections. As lin biao pointed out above, Social Security isn’t really in trouble at all, and can be fixed with minor adjustments, if we want to fix it. Which pretty much everyone does. (After the baby boomers retire, there is pretty much no growth in the cost of Social Security, so if we fix funding beyond 2030 or so, the problem never comes back.)
If Medicare cost growth can be brought down closer to the rate of inflation, that date moves farther out into the future. (Also, per capita public spending on health care is higher in the US than in most major industrialized countries. We also have a ridiculously high level of private spending on health care; there’s no reason to believe we couldn’t reduce private spending while improving health outcomes.)
Why we begin this conversation by assuming that no problem will ever get fixed, I don’t understand.
Agree with what everyone has already said, especially the Eli is an idiot stuff. He’s only feeding into the myth that SS is a doomed entitlement; when it could easily be made solvent for decades.
SS can be saved with one move: eliminate the $110,100 cap on payroll taxes. This would single-handedly fund SS for another 75 years, which means I can get SS and the next generation will have to figure someone else/thing to tax.
Isn’t this the guy who just won a Pulitzer? My god.
Now see how it will be since the gov has taken over the entire healthcare system.
Super has a point. Add SS taxes on dividends and capital gains too. Most wealthy people take their income from those sources.
#8, apparently we should be putting some more money into grade-school education too.