“I’m 65,” a wrinkled, retired superhero says in
Watchmen, as she gazes at an old photograph. “Every day, the
future looks a little bit darker. But the past, even the grimy parts of
it… well, it just keeps on getting brighter all the time.”

Nostalgia is, often, a lieโ€”an emotion that can fool us,
manipulate us, and slowly grind us into nothing. But regardless, the
past inevitably pulls at usโ€”and often, the only way to tolerate
it is to bend it, to change it, to make it better.

That’s one of any number of things one can take away from
Watchmen, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ 12-issue comic book
series from 1986. Since the last thing the world needs is one more
comic book geek raving about how fucking astounding Moore and Gibbons’
Watchmen is, I’ll keep it to a minimum: Is Watchmen the
best comic ever made? Probably. Is it one of the best books, period?
Yes. Was it madness to try and adapt it to film? Oh, for sure.

But it was also inevitable. So: 23 years after the first issue of
Watchmen came out, here’s the movie, directed by 300‘s
Zack Snyder and written by David Hayter and Alex Tse. And you know
what? Good for those guys. Long considered “unfilmable,”
Watchmen is fundamentally married to the comics
mediumโ€”it’s a postmodern comic that’s about comics. And once you
add in Moore’s labyrinthine, epic plot, Gibbons’ infinitely nuanced
artwork, a generation-jumping timeline, and hefty doses of psychology,
romance, and horror, it’s clear why all previous attempts to bring this
book to the screen have failed. The fact that Snyder’s film even
exists is no small feat; that it won’t be immediately offensive
to the book’s fans might be something of a miracle.

Watchmen imagines New York City in an alternate
1985โ€”one in which the United States won in Vietnam, in which
Nixon is still president, and in which superheroes, once heralded as
curiosities and saviors, have been outlawed. In this familiar, alien
world, a retired superhero is murdered: Edward Blake, better known as
the Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan), splatters against a Manhattan
sidewalk after being thrown out of his high-rise apartment’s plate
glass window.

Once an insane vigilante named Rorschach (Jackie Earle Haley) starts
snooping around, he warns his now-retired cohorts that they, too, could
be in danger. There’s the world-weary Dan Dreiberg, AKA Nite Owl
(Patrick Wilson); the lonely Laurie Jupiter, AKA Silk Spectre (Malin
Akerman); billionaire CEO Adrian Veidt, AKA Ozymandias (Matthew Goode);
and the one truly “superpowered” being on Earth, Dr. Manhattan (Billy
Crudup), a glowing blue dude who’s so far evolved that he can control
matter on an atomic level, see his future, teleport, and doesn’t even
have to bother wearing pants.

In the most basic terms, Watchmen is a murder mystery:
Rorschach investigates the Comedian’s murder and gets his pals to help.
In the book, this plot forms the barest skeleton, giving shape to a
stunningly dense and layered world full of sad, strange, and beautiful
characters. In this 160-minute-long film, though, it’s all Snyder can
do just to cram in the basics of the mysteryโ€”meaning just about
everything that made Watchmen such a landmark comic is either
left untold or hastily alluded to. Watchmen‘s is a vast world,
and Snyder does his best to capture it, but he can’t: There is simply
too much. Feeling at once too brief and waaaaay too long, Snyder’s film
is a gorgeous, bizarre, and impressively detailed experience that’s
only half-complete.

Maybe that’s why Snyder’s film is neither emotionally affecting nor
intellectually engaging: No matter how many stunning slow-mo images
Snyder shows us (and he shows us a lot), they feel hollow. As
Watchmen‘s characters traverse the wastes of the Antarctic and
the airless deserts of Mars, one can’t help but marvel at the ballsy
audacity and technical wizardry required to create these
imagesโ€”but ultimately, this is a film made up of sights that are
usually striking and occasionally chilling, but also fleeting and
ephemeral.

Which isn’t to say that for its lack of impact, the film isn’t still
impressive: Across the board, the performances are great, especially
when it comes to Haley, Wilson, and Crudup. And on a surface level
alone, Snyder’s slick imageryโ€”which often, beat by beat, mimics
Gibbons’ panelsโ€”is worth the price of admission. And the dude’s
soundtracking skills border on genius: The surreal, melancholy opening
credits play over Bob Dylan’s “The Times They Are A-Changin’,” the
Comedian’s funeral is introduced with Simon and Garfunkel’s “The Sounds
of Silence,” and there’s a particularly inspired use of Jimi Hendrix’s
“All Along the Watchtower.” (That said, when Leonard Cohen’s soundtrack
staple “Hallelujah” plays over a scene in which an impotent superhero
finally gets it up, you’ll likely feel an intense desire to flee the
theater as soon as possible.)

It’s those moments, and the performances, and the goofy-but-fun
action sequences that make Snyder’s Watchmen stand out from
Moore and Gibbons’: In the too-rare instances when Snyder treats his
film as its own entity rather than a moving storyboard, he hints at the
potential of a stronger film that might have been.

One senses that it’s a too-deep reverence that guides Snyder’s
handโ€”or even nostalgia for the genre-changing, literature-shaking
book that Watchmen was back in the ’80s. Which is fine, because
god knows if he’d strayed any further from Moore’s holy writ, Snyder
would be murdered by hordes of incensed fanboys. But in an ill-advised
attempt to translate rather than adapt Watchmen, Snyder has
boiled down the story to its cheesiest, most melodramatic moments: The
images have been made glossy, the violence has been amped up, the
storyline has been simplified. This is, technically, Watchmen,
but only a shadow of it, one drawn with too much reverence and too much
nostalgia. In what might be the film’s one truly self-reflective
moment, Dr. Manhattan narrates as we watch him being groomed by the
government into a potent propaganda device. “They are shaping me,” he
says, “into something gaudy.”

Watchmen

dir. Zack Snyder
Opens Fri March 6
Various Theaters

With honor and distinction, Erik Henriksen served as the executive editor of the Portland Mercury from 2004 to 2020. He can now be found at henriksenactual.com.

6 replies on “Men in Tights”

  1. Call me a sensitive little girl, but while reading the graphic novel, I was affected, shocked, and moved.

    The events in the film didn’t seem exaggerated to me. The action didn’t strike me as pumped up. The exchanges weren’t MORE melodramatic than those depicted in the book. Alan Moore is a melodramatic writer… And the book is as emotionally, psychologically, and violently charged as the movie.

    Shrug. That’s just me, though… And I admit that I do get affected. I let myself. And I love it.

  2. Rarely do I disagree with Erik, and he’s probably the only critic who can convince me to see something I’m hedging on (and I’ve been evangelizing “Speed Racer” all the past year), but I enjoyed it a lot more than he did. Having not read the book in a while I wasn’t jarred by cuts and was even pleasantly surprised by some lines and plot points I’d forgotten. I’ve seen it twice now because I could tell I’d missed some details, and indeed I had. It might not be perfect but MAN I liked the experience. Of course I’m very eager to see the longer cuts.

  3. I hated the action sequences a LOT, and the ending seemed rushed compared to the overexposition/backstorytelling of the first two hoursโ€”Veidt’s actions weren’t given room to sink in, but I sure do know that the Comedian killed a pregnant lady in Vietnam. Overall, though, it was better than I expected. I wasn’t bored, I wasn’t angered (except by some of the violenceโ€”the pleasure Snyder takes in brutality is waaaay too obvious; those scenes left me feeling complicit and gross). I’m also not sure if the movie would have made any sense at all if I hadn’t read the book; I’m curious to hear what someone who hasn’t read it thought.

Comments are closed.